Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would contitute a wasteful use of resources , on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone .
A on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone .
B on the ground of avoiding duplicated facilities alone .
C solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
D while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
E if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided
问问为什么选E 呢!
E解释了不建新医院的原因,是唯一有意义的选项
那C不对吗,C也是唯一的原因啊?
那到底if only 怎么用啊,请NN 说的清楚一点啊@
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would contitute a wasteful use of resources , on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone .
A on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone .
B on the ground of avoiding duplicated facilities alone .
C solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
D while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
E if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided
可以试试排除法:
A,B: "avoiding, avoidance"显然不如动词"avoided"用法好. 在GMAT中单词如果有动词表达法尽量用动词表达,而不要使用名词形式
C: "in that"和"because"是同一个意思,但在GMAT中"in that"是十分过时的一种表达方式,所以一般"in that"是错误选项标志
D:while 表示前后两句话的动作同时发生,但从本句中,使用因果关系的连词更符合逻辑一些
在网上搜索到了"if only"和"only if"的区别:
only if表示"只有";if only则表示"如果……就好了"。If only也可用于陈述语气。
I wake up only if the alarm clock rings. 只有闹钟响了,我才会醒。
If only the alarm clock had rung. 当时闹钟响了,就好了。
If only he comes early. 但愿他早点回来。
可是不是说in that 和 because 同时存在的时候 in that 要优于because 吗!
还有 if only 不是连词吗,而because 也是连词啊,那么两个连词怎么可以并用那?
在OG11中有一道语法题目注解上已经明确说了"in that"用法并无错误但已经过时.因此可以推断GMAC现在的喜好是:because > in that
也许以前是偏好"in that"但毕竟从OG的注解中得到的信息是偏好已经改变了
具体是OG11哪一题我不记得了,哪位NN记得吗?
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would contitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.
A on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone .
B on the ground of avoiding duplicated facilities alone .
C solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
D while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
E if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided
我觉得这是一个 logical predication的问题,当然我这个解释是马后炮了:
原文的逻辑是"如果...,在两个州之间的区域新建一个大医院仍然可能是对资源的浪费"。would contitute 暗示划线的部分应该表达好像解决了但是又没有真正解决对资源浪费的问题。
不当之处,请指正。
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |