ChaseDream

标题: 快要考试了,求问PREP157题 [打印本页]

作者: 期待蔚蓝    时间: 2007-1-12 21:40
标题: 快要考试了,求问PREP157题

157. In the mod-1920s the Hawthorne Works of the Western Electric Company was the scene of an intensive series of experiments that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers’ performance.

A.      that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers’ performance

B.     investigating the effects that changes in working conditions would have one workers’ performance

C.      for investigating what the effects on workers’ performance are that changes in working conditions would cause

D.     that investigated changes in working conditions’ effects on workers’ performance

E.      to investigate what the effects changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance

 

 

A: their没有指代

B: correct

C: that没有指代

D: conditions’ effects 改变原意

E: changes in working conditions would have做定语修饰the effectswhat the effects没有谓语。

E的谓语不是have么?怎么错了?


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-21 22:52:54编辑过]

作者: chasedreamtrue    时间: 2007-1-13 02:39
顶一下,这道题就是没有看懂,怎莫分析
作者: cold2100    时间: 2007-1-13 15:20

我主要根据to排除的

what the effects谓语是have


作者: leoozop    时间: 2007-1-13 22:17

B.     investigating the effects 『that changes in working conditions would have 』on workers’ perfor

E.      to investigate what the effects changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance

E结构混乱,effects changes 。。。   would have on  错,

若changes是N,则effect应用单数修饰,若为V,则出现2动词

E结构混乱,effects changes 。。。   would have on  错,

若changes是N,则effect应用单数修饰,若为V,则出现2动词


作者: adlinker    时间: 2007-3-28 19:15
同意leoozop的意见,问题主要出在effects changes上

作者: adlinker    时间: 2007-4-4 19:07
这题很难,做了一次又错了,主要是看不懂题目的意思,选了D。
作者: estherpeter    时间: 2007-4-6 17:27

对啊 这道题没有看懂

有没有人清楚的解释一下呢


作者: DJungle    时间: 2007-4-15 01:32
以下是引用leoozop在2007-1-13 22:17:00的发言:

B.     investigating the effects 『that changes in working conditions would have 』on
                workers’ perfor

E.      to investigate what the effects changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance

E结构混乱,effects changes 。。。   would have on  错,

若changes是N,则effect应用单数修饰,若为V,则出现2动词

E结构混乱,effects changes 。。。   would have on  错,

若changes是N,则effect应用单数修饰,若为V,则出现2动词

E结构混乱,effects changes 。。。   would have on  错,

若changes是N,则effect应用单数修饰,若为V,则出现2动词

这个B选项有on????? 为什么我的版本没有?如果有on,就好分析多了。。


作者: zhch1222    时间: 2007-4-15 10:55
如果E选项把effects前的the去掉,是否就对了呢?
作者: kaochieh    时间: 2007-4-16 08:55

 如果E选项把effects前的the去掉,是否就对了呢?

我也覺得是 the 的問題... 跟effects and changes 沒有關係....

因為詢問what effects....這些effects並不確定有沒有或特指哪些effects..

所以加了定冠詞the很怪...

供參考!


作者: quinlee    时间: 2007-4-19 16:56
此题结构是否是倒装?
作者: crowkiller    时间: 2007-5-28 00:22

那位大N 能把 这个 investigating the effects that changes in working conditions would have one workers’ performance 翻译一下,或者分析一下结构。

看不懂。。。


作者: 妖还在    时间: 2007-6-1 12:08

这个题的意思是这个公司做实验调查工作环境的改变对工人表现的影响作用.

investigating the effects (that changes in working conditions would have) on workers’ performance 中

investigating现在分词形式修饰experiments

the effects做了investigate的宾语.

也就是investigate the effects on workers' performance

其中the effects又套了个定语从句>.<"

E中我也觉得似乎问题在the,去掉的话正好就是have effects on.貌似是个倒装

个人理解,大家讨论


作者: yf1369    时间: 2007-6-9 09:46

我的版本里B项没有on啊,就是因为这个把它排除了。如果有on就对了,如果没on还是对的谁来分析一下啊,我不明白了


作者: qianrene    时间: 2007-6-9 10:40
E和B看似都对,但是E的WHAT从句中没有IS
作者: benja    时间: 2007-7-23 10:39

A.     that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers’ performance

为什么不对呀???

their指代changes嘛,可以么???


作者: doudoulovely    时间: 2007-7-23 17:11
以下是引用benja在2007-7-23 10:39:00的发言:

A.     that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers’ performance

为什么不对呀???

their指代changes嘛,可以么???

changes 还可以指代conditions,有歧义,所以不能选
作者: yongyang86r    时间: 2007-8-6 16:22
以下是引用妖还在在2007-6-1 12:08:00的发言:

这个题的意思是这个公司做实验调查工作环境的改变对工人表现的影响作用.

investigating the effects (that changes in working conditions would have) on workers’ performance 中

investigating现在分词形式修饰experiments

the effects做了investigate的宾语.

也就是investigate the effects on workers' performance

其中the effects又套了个定语从句>.<"

E中我也觉得似乎问题在the,去掉的话正好就是have effects on.貌似是个倒装

个人理解,大家讨论

弱弱的问一下,如果是定语从句的话,为什么要用changes(三人称单数)修饰effects而不用change
作者: susan0219    时间: 2007-11-8 06:32
以下是引用妖还在在2007-6-1 12:08:00的发言:

这个题的意思是这个公司做实验调查工作环境的改变对工人表现的影响作用.

investigating the effects (that changes in working conditions would have) on workers’ performance 中

investigating现在分词形式修饰experiments

the effects做了investigate的宾语.

也就是investigate the effects on workers' performance

其中the effects又套了个定语从句>.<"

E中我也觉得似乎问题在the,去掉的话正好就是have effects on.貌似是个倒装

个人理解,大家讨论

同意同意!做的时候读了一遍E,觉得比较顺,就选了,后来才发现原来E中investigate的宾语从句中少了谓语动词。非常感谢!
作者: ibmpcs    时间: 2007-12-4 18:53
以下是引用leoozop在2007-1-13 22:17:00的发言:

B.     investigating the effects 『that changes in working conditions would have 』on workers’ perfor

E.      to investigate what the effects changes in working conditions would have on workers’ performance

E结构混乱,effects changes 。。。   would have on  错,

若changes是N,则effect应用单数修饰,若为V,则出现2动词

E结构混乱,effects changes 。。。   would have on  错,

若changes是N,则effect应用单数修饰,若为V,则出现2动词

E结构混乱,effects changes 。。。   would have on  错,

若changes是N,则effect应用单数修饰,若为V,则出现2动词

同意这个解释。


作者: lijiahui0422    时间: 2008-5-11 23:32
以下是引用yongyang86r在2007-8-6 16:22:00的发言:

弱弱的问一下,如果是定语从句的话,为什么要用changes(三人称单数)修饰effects而不用change

我觉得是个同位语从句 不是定语从句

b    investigating the effects that changes in working conditions would have one workers’ performance


作者: russellguo    时间: 2008-7-4 20:23

up






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3