请教两道OG逻辑og-103,og-123 - ChaseDream

网上下载的123题发现与122题重复，能否将OG对于123题的解释一并贴上来，谢谢！

以下是引用mindfree在2003-10-29 6:59:00的发言：
1. First you need to understand the argument and its reasoning. Assumption is to fill the "gap" between premises and conclusions. So the meaning of the assumption must be relevant to the argument. To test assumption, use negative and see if original argument still holds or not.

A. Irrelevant. The argument is not about whether the market can expand or not. And cheap and high-performance are not mentioned. Use A negative you can see original argument does not change.
B. Irrelevant. It does not fit in the argument at all.
C. Right. The gap in the original argument is that the premises said that innovation is driven by racers and conclusion is that innovation is limited to just a certain type. There is a gap between "racer" and certain innovations. Let me use an analogy:

Computer software sales are driven by teens. So software development is limited to games. The gap is between teens and game. The argument by default associate one with the other, in another word, by assumption.

C is just the statement of the association.
D. Irrelevant. It is a whle new statement, which is not substantiated by the original argument.
E. If you truly understand the meaning of E, you would not pick it. Another irrelevant choice.

我做这题使用取非削弱来做的，可见两种方法是可以融会贯通的。(以前一直认为两个方法是孤立的，一个题只能用一种方法解)

建议后来的朋友把这些化石贴认真读了，比直接实时问要来的好。毕竟在某一个特定时刻不会集中比过去这些大牛更多的牛人。

办法就是遇到问题，搜索出来都读了。有重点大牛的重点读。

以下是引用Andrea625在2005-7-30 1:39:00的发言：

建议后来的朋友把这些化石贴认真读了，比直接实时问要来的好。毕竟在某一个特定时刻不会集中比过去这些大牛更多的牛人。

办法就是遇到问题，搜索出来都读了。有重点大牛的重点读。

这个解决后，按照大牛ID搜索出来，拜读。

Highlight出来的意思是不是, 碰到问题先搜索, 若有比较好的NN解释, 再按照NN的ID搜索拜读? 是个好方法! (不过, 还要看时间和问题的针对性)

取非了就变成MegaCorp’s goal is not possible to meet only if continuing advances in product quality are possible.
然后再怎么想呢，有点转不过来。。。

以下是引用snowjing在2005-7-30 5:55:00的发言：

对了,忘了问有些是NN的参与贴,用ID搜索不出来的吧?

应该排除这种可能性.

可以搜索出来,比如本贴2楼的mindfree的回复,点击上面挨着"邮箱"/"引用"的"搜索"按钮即可.

以下是引用mindfree在2003-10-29 6:59:00的发言：
1. First you need to understand the argument and its reasoning. Assumption is to fill the "gap" between premises and conclusions. So the meaning of the assumption must be relevant to the argument. To test assumption, use negative and see if original argument still holds or not.

A. Irrelevant. The argument is not about whether the market can expand or not. And cheap and high-performance are not mentioned. Use A negative you can see original argument does not change.
B. Irrelevant. It does not fit in the argument at all.
C. Right. The gap in the original argument is that the premises said that innovation is driven by racers and conclusion is that innovation is limited to just a certain type. There is a gap between "racer" and certain innovations. Let me use an analogy:

Computer software sales are driven by teens. So software development is limited to games. The gap is between teens and game. The argument by default associate one with the other, in another word, by assumption.

C is just the statement of the association.
D. Irrelevant. It is a whle new statement, which is not substantiated by the original argument.
E. If you truly understand the meaning of E, you would not pick it. Another irrelevant choice.

第一个问题的GAP是可以找出来的还算比较明显，而第二个问题的mindfree大大所说的association，并没有理解，这道题的假设是需要肯定一个目标完成的可能性，这在laywer的assumption方法中该归到哪一种呢？

大大没有解释B，呵呵偶是死缠烂打，我觉得 B似乎也是一个架桥，只不过没有从PREMISE架到CONCLUTION，而是架反了，架反了就是错的

Mindfree关于桥梁型假设题解释的真经典！

我的理解：就是说赛车比赛有其对参赛自行车的一定的标准要求，尽管赛车手崇尚革新，但他所要求的革新必须在赛车比赛要求的车型的范围之内，如果超出了这个范围，那么这种革新是无意义的，也就是自行车制造商卖不出去的