ChaseDream
标题: 超新真题求解！！ [打印本页]
作者: colorsofthewind 时间: 2003-10-28 18:05
标题: 超新真题求解！！
8. Contrary to the scholarly wisdom of the 1950’s and early 1960’s that predicted the processes of modernization and rationalization would gradually undermine it, ethnicity is a worldwide phenomenon of increasing importance.
(A) would gradually undermine it
(B) to be a gradual undermining of it
(C) would be a gradual undermining of ethnicity
(D) to gradually undermine ethnicity
(E) gradually undermining it
Key: a.
I am wondering:
(1) a 中的宾语从句中并没有一定要出现的that
(2) a 中it 指代模糊
My key: D.
那d 错在哪里呢？
14. With cloning technology, scientists are approaching what has long been the ultimate goal of modern husbandry: achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be limited to manufactured goods.
(A) achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be
(B) achieving farm animals with a consistency of quality and production as were once thought of as
(C) achieving in farm animals a consistency of quality and production that was once thought to be
(D) achievement of farm animals whose consistency of quality and production are the same as what were once thought to he
(E) achievement of farm animals at a consistency of quality and production once thought of as
Key: c.
I am wondering:
(1): 后面应该跟什么。名词，动名次。看起来，ets 最近蛮喜欢冒号的
(2) 一般说来抽象名词不是比动名词好么？那这里问什么是achieving?
(3) 后面的that was once thought to be 是跳跃修饰consistency， 怎么理解这种跳跃修饰，什么时候可以，什么时候不可以？
（4）thought 后面只能是to be ?可以是 thought of as 么？
作者: colorsofthewind 时间: 2003-10-28 18:11
17. Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.
(A) with the intention
(B) the intention of which is
(C) intended
(D) and intending
(E) so intended as
key: c.
怎么来对比a, c选项哪个好呢？
作者: gemj 时间: 2003-10-28 19:17
以下是引用colorsofthewind在2003-10-28 18:05:00的发言：
8. Contrary to the scholarly wisdom of the 1950’s and early 1960’s that predicted the processes of modernization and rationalization would gradually undermine it, ethnicity is a worldwide phenomenon of increasing importance.
(A) would gradually undermine it
(B) to be a gradual undermining of it
(C) would be a gradual undermining of ethnicity
(D) to gradually undermine ethnicity
(E) gradually undermining it
Key: a.
I am wondering:
(1) a 中的宾语从句中并没有一定要出现的that
(2) a 中it 指代模糊
My key: D.
那d 错在哪里呢？
（1）个人猜测：predicted的前面已经有了THAT，再加一个显得有些累赘
（2）IT指代主句的主语，并无模糊。
(3) D错在出现了FRAGMENT
作者: gemj 时间: 2003-10-28 19:18
以下是引用colorsofthewind在2003-10-28 18:05:00的发言：
I am wondering:
(1): 后面应该跟什么。名词，动名次。看起来，ets 最近蛮喜欢冒号的
(2) 一般说来抽象名词不是比动名词好么？那这里问什么是achieving?
(3) 后面的that was once thought to be 是跳跃修饰consistency， 怎么理解这种跳跃修饰，什么时候可以，什么时候不可以？
（4）thought 后面只能是to be ?可以是 thought of as 么？
(1) 可以跟句子，名词（性短语）
(2) 这里强调动作
(3) 跳跃修饰，你喜欢的时候都可以.
(4）有think of somebody/something as something的用法
Peter had always thought of Kate as someone to be avoided.
I want you to think of this as your home.
作者: gemj 时间: 2003-10-28 19:19
以下是引用colorsofthewind在2003-10-28 18:11:00的发言：
17. Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.
(A) with the intention
(B) the intention of which is
(C) intended
(D) and intending
(E) so intended as
key: c.
怎么来对比a, c选项哪个好呢？
With似乎有修饰funds的嫌疑。但还请牛牛指教！
作者: kathy72 时间: 2003-10-28 19:23
1.冒号后面跟的成份应看它所有注释的是什么.例如在这里它要解释的是the ultimate goal, 因此可以是一个名词性的结构.
2.这里achieving ...是一个分词结构, 表达起来比名词结构要清楚, 简洁, 而且从上下文意思是倾向于表达一种持续的动作而不是一种静止的状态.
3.跳跃修饰只要不产生歧义是可以的. 一般来说前面是 a of b的结构时, 后置定语修饰中心词a. 而且这里定语从句的谓语动词是单数, 因此很明显是修饰consistency.
4.我认为think of as 是可以的, 但是as 后而应跟名词, 正如refer to as 一样.
作者: mjiehu 时间: 2003-10-29 09:24
Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.
-->Asset allocators create portfolios, (which is) intented to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.
not sure though
作者: colorsofthewind 时间: 2003-10-29 10:18
标题: 还有疑问。。。
以下是引用gemj在2003-10-28 19:17:00的发言：
（1）个人猜测：predicted的前面已经有了THAT，再加一个显得有些累赘
（2）IT指代主句的主语，并无模糊。
(3) D错在出现了FRAGMENT
什么是fragment?
宾语从句不一定 要跟that?
这个it不也可以往前指代么？
作者: gemj 时间: 2003-10-29 10:34
fragment就是句子不完整。
predicted 后面的宾语从句不是完整的句子。
作者: colorsofthewind 时间: 2003-10-29 11:44
可以理解为：
predict ...to do something 么？
那不就完整了
作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-10-29 13:06
T8,是不是答案错了.应该选D,如果选A,缺主语了.这样会歧义的.
T14,有点糊涂啊.
作者: dandan74 时间: 2003-10-29 15:20
predict ... to do something不好，明显有歧义，注意predict这个词及物动词，它的宾语应该是要predict的内容，所以一般要接一个that的宾语从句才能很好的表达.也就是说不是predict processes, 而是predict后面的一个句子表示的现象
作者: killdream 时间: 2003-10-29 16:04
以下是引用colorsofthewind在2003-10-28 18:05:00的发言：
8. Contrary to the scholarly wisdom of the 1950’s and early 1960’s that predicted the processes of modernization and rationalization would gradually undermine it, ethnicity is a worldwide phenomenon of increasing importance.
(A) would gradually undermine it
(B) to be a gradual undermining of it
(C) would be a gradual undermining of ethnicity
(D) to gradually undermine ethnicity
(E) gradually undermining it
Key: a.
I am wondering:
(1) a 中的宾语从句中并没有一定要出现的that
(2) a 中it 指代模糊
My key: D.
那d 错在哪里呢？
我认为 the processes of modernization and rationalization would gradually undermine it是predicted的宾语从句，主语是the scholarly wisdom ，这样划线部分一定的有完整的谓语，因此选a
作者: shrkl 时间: 2003-10-29 19:20
T8： 同意13楼的观点。有predict sth to do的说法么？ 好像只见过predict sth，加动名词和加从句的。找了找书，没有predict sth to do的例子。
排除法：A， C predict 加从句
B， D， predict sth to do
E， predict sth doing
A，C， E 用it， B，D用ethnicity
我会先排除BDE
C中简化后变成modernization and rationalization would be a undermining 显然没有 would undermine 好。 所以选A
我也不喜欢那个it，只读前半句绝对指代不清，不过想想那可不是一句话呀. 如果抹去从that 到逗号Contrary to the scholarly wisdom of ...， ethnicity is .... 这个句子是意思完整不变的。换句话说，抹去的部分可有可无，用ethnicity代it反而觉得累赘。
作者: shrkl 时间: 2003-10-29 19:30
14. With cloning technology, scientists are approaching what has long been the ultimate goal of modern husbandry: achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be limited to manufactured goods.
(A) achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be
(B) achieving farm animals with a consistency of quality and production as were once thought of as
(C) achieving in farm animals a consistency of quality and production that was once thought to be
(D) achievement of farm animals whose consistency of quality and production are the same as what were once thought to he
(E) achievement of farm animals at a consistency of quality and production once thought of as
Key: c.
对于14题: 我是首先看是 achievement of 或者是achieving 什么， 是farm animals 还是 a consistency of ... 显然 consistency 是目标，排除B D E。
A C 前面没区别， 后半段 a：as once thought to be 显然省了主语是人但as前面是找不到人的。 C恰好用被动语态。
作者: shrkl 时间: 2003-10-29 19:48
17. Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.
(A) with the intention
(B) the intention of which is
(C) intended
(D) and intending
(E) so intended as
key: c.
我拿不准但可能蒙对。排除法很容易剩A C。觉得都可以，但with一般是表示伴随的状态，另外我不喜欢"the", 为什么不用“a” 或者什么都不用呢？ 所以会选c。
作者: colorsofthewind 时间: 2003-10-29 19:58
很清晰啊！！谢谢！！：-））
作者: appledandan 时间: 2003-10-31 11:03
我还有一个疑问，intended to究竟修饰哪个，Asset allocators还是 portfolios？从逻辑意义上来讲，应该是人设计投资组合，意图去获得好结果，准确的讲，是人intend to do.所以我觉得ying应该用intending to,而不是intended to.
17. Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.
(A) with the intention
(B) the intention of which is
(C) intended
(D) and intending
(E) so intended as
key: c.
作者: seanql 时间: 2003-12-8 22:28
以下是引用appledandan在2003-10-31 11:03:00的发言：
我还有一个疑问，intended to究竟修饰哪个，Asset allocators还是 portfolios？从逻辑意义上来讲，应该是人设计投资组合，意图去获得好结果，准确的讲，是人intend to do.所以我觉得ying应该用intending to,而不是intended to.
17. Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.
(A) with the intention
(B) the intention of which is
(C) intended
(D) and intending
(E) so intended as
key: c.
我也有这个问题,哪位能再讲讲?
作者: cindy_liulan 时间: 2004-7-27 14:26
顶一下!
我也选A的,有NN可以帮忙一下吗?
作者: oldspanish 时间: 2004-7-28 02:03
资产分配人创造投资组合,为了能在牛市和熊市中都能取得好的收益.
从这句话的意思上理解,
如果是-ing,则做伴随状语,表目的,理解为"为了"后的东西是修饰动词"创造",理解会有偏差;而如果将"为了..."当作定语短语成分,修饰"投资组合",我认为更加贴切.
A太罗嗦了,不idiom.
故支持选C.
作者: gmat700+ 时间: 2004-7-28 03:45
17. Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.
(A) with the intention
(B) the intention of which is
(C) intended
(D) and intending
(E) so intended as
这题如果选A的话，会有歧义，因为搞不清with the intention是修饰mutual fund还是修饰asset allocators。如果选C的话，意思就很明显了，是修饰mutual fund。因为如果要是asset allocators是intend的逻辑主语的话，应该用intending。
愚见，还请NN进一步确证。
作者: allaneli 时间: 2004-7-29 01:22
intended 修饰整个句子（一个动作），表示主句的目的。
作者: gmat700+ 时间: 2004-7-29 05:05
以下是引用allaneli在2004-7-29 1:22:00的发言：
intended 修饰整个句子（一个动作），表示主句的目的。
我在语法大全987的word文档里搜索了intend这个词，发现无论是题目里还是og的解释里凡是用到intended的，intended的逻辑主语全部都是表示事物的名词。如果这里认为intened修饰句子的动作，那么也是说它的逻辑主语是人。这与我所了解得intended用法不符。请将此题与下面两题比较，intended的逻辑主语都是物。
大全433、Intended primarily to stimulate family summer travel, the new airfare, which allows both an adult and a child to fly for the price of one ticket, and also shortens the advance-purchase requirement for family travel to a minimum of seven days rather than fourteen.
(A) and also shortens the advance-purchase requirement for family travel to a minimum of seven days rather than
(B) and also lessens the advance-purchase requirement for family travel to a seven-day minimum from
(C) also shortens the advance-purchase requirement for family travel to a minimum of seven days rather than that of
(D) also lessens the advance-purchase requirement for family travel to a seven-day minimum from（E）
(E) also shortens the advance-purchase requirement for family travel to a minimum of seven days rather than
大全73、Alaska regularly deposits some of its profits from the sale of oil into a special fund, with the intention to sustain the state’s economy after the exhaustion of its oil reserves.
(A) fund, with the intention to sustain the state’s economy after the exhaustion of its oil reserves
(B) fund, the intention of which is to sustain the state’s economy after they have exhausted their oil reserves
(C) fund intended to sustain the state’s economy after oil reserves are exhausted
(D) fund intended to sustain the state’s economy after exhausting its oil reserves（C）
(E) fund that they intend to sustain the state’s economy after oil reserves are exhausted
请进一步讨论！
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-29 5:13:51编辑过]
作者: LISAYUAN750616 时间: 2004-7-29 11:14
关于
Key: a.
I am wondering:
(1) a 中的宾语从句中并没有一定要出现的that
(2) a 中it 指代模糊
XDF 教师说过代词先于名字出现优先指代最早出现的名词好像是这样说的根据原文看，IT 一定指ethnicity ，D的答案就重复了个人意见不要见笑。
作者: dream1111 时间: 2004-9-30 01:47
以下是引用allaneli在2004-7-29 1:22:00的发言：
intended 修饰整个句子（一个动作），表示主句的目的。
I have never ever seen such use of intended.
Obviously here we can think of the ' intended' as ' somebody intends sth to do soth 'or take it as an adj .
作者: usdream 时间: 2004-10-1 14:20
intend A to do B. 一位特意让A去做某事。 这在高中英语里面有这个知识点， e.g. intend this book as your birthday present
所以这里， intended 可理解为过去分词做形容词来就近修饰mutual fund
open to discussion!
作者: G_KEVIN 时间: 2004-10-2 23:07
以下是引用allaneli在2004-7-29 1:22:00的发言：
intended 修饰整个句子（一个动作），表示主句的目的。
同意，那个fund intended to也是修饰整个句子。
btw，achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals ，这里面有个保持句子重心的问题，核心词是consistency而不是后面的q和p；
作者: bobwangwb 时间: 2004-12-17 01:04
17. Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of of mutual funds, intened to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets
我觉得：首先，intented 不是修饰 funds，因为如果修饰funds，则它们之间的逗号纯粹多余。而且句子重心偏向了主句之外的东西。其次，根据已有的题来看，intended都是与非人的名词搭配，故我倾向intended修饰 portifolios，意思上也说得通。
第一次发帖，呵呵，海涵 
作者: anyname 时间: 2005-1-31 12:55
以下是引用bobwangwb在2004-12-17 1:04:00的发言：17. Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of of mutual funds, intened to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets
我觉得：首先，intented 不是修饰 funds，因为如果修饰funds，则它们之间的逗号纯粹多余。而且句子重心偏向了主句之外的东西。其次，根据已有的题来看，intended都是与非人的名词搭配，故我倾向intended修饰 portifolios，意思上也说得通。
第一次发帖，呵呵，海涵
完全同意bobwangwb的说法。这里intended 肯定不是修饰mutual funds 。"often in the form of of mutual funds"是插入语，也就是说拿掉它句子仍然完整 （Asset allocators create portfolios intened to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets）。而且mutual funds本身是不能turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets，只有某些 (selectively created) portifolios with certain mutual funds/stocks才能达此目的。
作者: lingling2005 时间: 2005-3-13 11:11
For 17, I also think "intended" is modified the action "create portfolio". and the logical subject for "intended" is "an action". But here "an action" is not here. So here comes one question. could the 状语 's logical subject is different with the subject of the main sentence? and 状语's logical subject does not shown in the sentence?
作者: ethyl 时间: 2005-5-10 21:50
with the intention修饰句子主语
intended修饰portfolios
关于这个知识点，OG上解释得很清楚
作者: titatita 时间: 2005-11-9 09:05
As Liz had predicted, the rumours were soon forgotten.
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |