ETS官方那几套题找不到讨论连接，只能打出来了：
In theory,Papua New Guinea could be a substantial exporter of tropical crops. In actuality, it is not. The reason is that 97percent of all land is owned by clans and cannot be bought or sold by individuals, and thus the kinds of realignment of propertis that would be necessary to achieve maximum production for export have been impossible to achieve.
The answer to which of the following questions would be most relevant to evaluating the adequacy of the explantation given above?
A. Who owns the 3 percent of the land in Papua New Guinea that is not owned by clans?
B. what percentage of Papua New Guinea 's current production of tropical crops is consumed within the country?
C. How much longer is land ownership by clans expected to remain the prevailing cultural pattern in Papua New Guinea ?
D. Which of the tropical crops currently grown in Papua New Guinea could be exported if there were a surplus for export?
E. How does Papua New Guinea 's current production capacity for tropical crops compare with the maximum capacity that property realignment would make possible?
看来打字速度还是不行。
有nn解释一下这个题目吗？
我用排除法，选E，
My vote is E as well. If there is significant difference in crop production between the scenario with realignment and the one without the alignment, then the conclusion holds, otherwise does not.
Papua目前的热带作物产能，与如果采取联盟制能够达到的最大产能，到底有多大区别？
要evaluate此题，就是找题目的中心思想（哈哈）
题目说：Papua没成为出口国的原因是产能不足，因为宗派割据，没有联盟（联盟可显著增加产能）
那么我就要问问了，是真的么？ 如果有了联盟和目前的宗派割据产能一样，那又没有都无所谓啦
可以作为AWA的分析联系哦
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |