ChaseDream

标题: GWD29-7 [打印本页]

作者: gyfang123 时间: 2006-12-13 13:42
标题: GWD29-7

7. Until a few centuries ago, any large bones discovered in the fields or caves of Europe, now known to be large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed to be the remains of giants and were often displayed as curiosities in castles, palaces, town halls, churches, and monasteries.

now known to be large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed to be
presently known as from large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed as
bones now known to be those of large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed to be
bones known at present as of large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed as those of
currently known as those of large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed to be those of

答案是C, 我挑的是A. 乱选的.可是我看了几遍还是看不出来到底那个更好和选的理由..请那位指点一下. 谢了

作者: cwcc 时间: 2006-12-20 10:12
我选的是B，感觉C选项，有两个主语啊，都是BONES，

作者: 期待蔚蓝 时间: 2007-1-10 00:56
同问！

作者: cold2100 时间: 2007-1-10 01:53

我选C A和B中 now known to be large prehistoric animals可以向前修饰any large bones ，也可以向后修饰谓语动词产生修饰歧义。

C出现名词bones应该为独立主格结构，n+ed/-ing分词形式消灭了前面选项产生的歧义。

作者: joejo9 时间: 2007-6-5 11:20

問nn有"known to be"的嗎？我以爲是"known as"，所以就排除掉C了。。。

作者: isa0709 时间: 2007-8-5 11:54

都是bones，有必要用独立主格吗？同一主语不是更简洁吗？我选E

作者: joyspring 时间: 2007-9-24 18:22

不是独立主格，是同位语中的名词性同位结构

作者: Jabils 时间: 2007-9-24 19:48

以下是引用gyfang123在2006-12-13 13:42:00的发言：

now known to be large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed to be
presently known as from large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed as
bones now known to be those of large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed to be
bones known at present as of large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed as those of
currently known as those of large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed to be those of

答案是C, 我挑的是A. 乱选的.可是我看了几遍还是看不出来到底那个更好和选的理由..请那位指点一下. 谢了

同位语语法点，A的问题是Bones discovered ... to be large prehistoric animals ( bones to be animals )肯定是不对的。

作者: ruru8ruru8 时间: 2008-8-5 13:54

AB选项中
now 前面已有「，」隔开，应该不会有歧义吧

作者: shuishui_xp 时间: 2008-8-5 14:06

(*^__^*) 嘻嘻……，A有个明显的错误，now known to be those of large prehistoric animals，至少也要对象对等吧。到底还是个bones的嘛。

作者: shuishui_xp 时间: 2008-8-5 14:10

这个题目真是经典，前部部分，比较不对等，需要those of；后半部分，来了个remains of.

作者: yzysoly528 时间: 2008-9-11 17:49
up

作者: linuxzh 时间: 2008-11-18 21:47

同意C,开始做错了B.

觉得楼上MM说的经典,比较成分不对等,该算是ETS较难的了吧

作者: minixinxin 时间: 2008-12-27 15:38

同意C 正确,但是不知道B 的错误在哪里呢? 是ASSUME AS 的用法不对吗? presently known as from large prehistoric animals 应该可以修饰BONES 吧? 这里用的没错吧? 有没有牛人可以解释下B的错误.

作者: AlienX 时间: 2008-12-27 16:45
B中的"presently known as from large prehistoric animals" mis-modifies Europe.

作者: yzhao26 时间: 2009-3-8 13:36
up

作者: bluebus0831 时间: 2009-5-8 15:04
up

作者: jean1280 时间: 2009-6-28 14:25
UP

作者: wangming 时间: 2009-8-27 15:57
此题还是不明白B为什么错，希望哪位高手解答一下。。。谢拉

作者: Oyster+gmat 时间: 2009-8-28 13:28

以下是引用minixinxin在2008/12/27 15:38:00的发言：

查了牛津 assume直接跟名词 / that/ to be

没看到跟as

供参考

作者: jaze 时间: 2011-3-9 19:46

此题还是不明白B为什么错，

-- by 会员 wangming (2009/8/27 15:57:00)

known as from ...., 错了
known as 是作为什么而出名，直接跟名词，这里跟的是介词，所以错

作者: flewrudy 时间: 2011-5-16 16:29
那请问下为啥e不行呢？
是不是因为他后面多了个those of显得wordy了？

作者: jaze 时间: 2011-5-24 16:51
e错是因为those of 错了
因为 bones of remains 不对

作者: 070674108 时间: 2011-12-13 15:49
B中，any large bones..., known as from large prehistoric animals.

读的时候就感觉不是很通顺，但还是稀里糊涂地选了B。

猛然发现，bones 怎么可以和 from large prehistoric animals这个介词短语对等呢？

呜呼哀哉，此题貌似和OG 12中 121题“particular of” 考的同一语法点，望指正！

作者: wildmantomba 时间: 2012-5-13 10:51
1、comparison:排除A
bones与animal做比较

2、pronoun:排除DE
those指代bones，文句变成bones were ....bones of remains

3、idiom:排除BD
assume to be
knows as NOUN

作者: zhangaiping 时间: 2013-10-7 20:06
通过总结前人，非大牛，在这里总结一下～
A now known……存在修饰 Europe 的嫌疑；animals 和remains 不对等
B 错误同A 再加上 known as 要接名词，这里from 错
C 正确
D known as 用法不对，of 前面没有对象和remains 对等,后面还出现了，those of remains of
E 这里依然是 those of 和后面的 those of the remains of , 不对等

作者: yzzqy23 时间: 2015-7-31 11:54
我觉得B可能还有一个问题，就是any large bones discovered in the fields or caves of Europe，discovered...后面这一串作为限制性定语已经限制了前面的名词any large bones，就是指那些在欧洲。。。地方发现的任何大骨头。。。，逗号之后的now known作为定语修饰前面整个词，就感觉像是那些没有在欧洲发现的那些large bones就不是史前动物的一部分了。显然违背逻辑。

作者: shjtSAIF 时间: 2015-8-7 05:39

joejo9 发表于 2007-6-4 22:20
問nn有"known to be"的嗎？我以爲是"known as"，所以就排除掉C了。。。

有known to be sth的用法,可以是known to do sth/known to be sth/known as sth/known for sth

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)