ChaseDream

标题: [求助]请教GWD31-04-40 [打印本页]

作者: mengshawang    时间: 2006-12-11 11:06
标题: [求助]请教GWD31-04-40

请牛牛们帮解释一下GWD31-04-40

Q40.

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives.  However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites. 

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

A.     These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.

B.     Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.

C.     Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.

D.     Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.

E.Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

 

 

答案是E,可是A为什么不对呢?请教请教!
作者: glgry    时间: 2006-12-21 18:52

Even if these wine makers have not been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites, wines without sulfites may still be on shelf for customers. Customers may have to consume them in a shorter time after buying.


作者: davidli8888    时间: 2006-12-23 21:22

D appears to be an assumption as well. What is wrong with choice D?


作者: l980053    时间: 2006-12-24 16:40
D错在文中只说了an allergic reaction to sulfites,无关项. 




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3