In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations. However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools. This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A. The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia’s government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.
B. During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.
C. Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia’s government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession.
D. Teachers in Vargonia’s government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers.
E. During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded.
答案是B，我现在也接受，但是我的想法是：
1，recession就要裁员，因为需求下降，学校就是学生少了；
2，学生少了是因为recession，付不起学费，
3，因为公立学校免费，所以不存在付不起的情况，因而学生不减少；
4，更有甚者，私立学校的学生还要来，且学生比教师数量不变，因而老师数量不减反增！
我的疑问就出来了：
1，我认为，只要能说明学生数量不会减少就可以保证老师不被裁员就可以了，公立学校免费，所以不受经济影响，这就够了，提干已经给了！！！
2，如果原文没有免费一说，而是要收费，那么保证学生比老师比例不变就是废话，这是每个学校都会做的，这样的话，经济衰退，只要不是免费，学生就要减少，那么为了保持比例不变，老师还要减少！
support题，充分就行了，不是必要的，
也就是说没有答案，题目照样可以推出结论，有了更好而已；
如果变成必要，那就是assumption题了
up
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |