ChaseDream

标题: GWD31-2-32 [打印本页]

作者: jaleel    时间: 2006-12-9 15:18
标题: GWD31-2-32

Q32:

Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?

  1. Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
  2. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.

  3. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
  4. The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
  5. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

答案是B,不太明白。


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-9 15:19:50编辑过]

作者: glgry    时间: 2006-12-21 19:37

The press secretary wanted to prove that the cancellation conducted by president is not partisan based by demonstrating that all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in the report written by nonpartisan auditors. Among the projects identified as wasteful in the report if only those projects in legislative districts controlled by opposition parties were cancelled by president, the cancellation is by all means a partisan action.


作者: lihjpb    时间: 2007-9-28 11:06

按楼下的意思的话,我觉得B应该把the president's party 改为 the opposition parties才合理吧


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-9-28 11:11:42编辑过]

作者: cyoasis    时间: 2007-9-28 12:14

B不正印证了题意吗?the president's party 对对方予以重罚,是建立在他们自己的wasteful projects 不多,"were not mostly",要不然不就有partisan politics的可能了嘛


作者: adcc5460    时间: 2007-9-28 13:12
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: adcc5460    时间: 2007-9-28 13:14
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3