ChaseDream

标题: OG邏輯題.....很急og-167,og-172,og-198 [打印本页]

作者: GiGi    时间: 2003-10-25 20:12
标题: OG邏輯題.....很急og-167,og-172,og-198
有沒有人可以幫我解OG邏輯題目:
#167(E)的答案錯在哪?
#172.#200#203.請解釋(有點不懂ETS的說法)
#198(D)(E)的答案刪除的理由

還請好心的人能儘速幫幫我

作者: light    时间: 2003-10-26 14:48
167. Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. The chief executive is, therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.

The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that

(D) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from no source other than their subordinates
(E) some employees are more concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors


assumption的题目可以用"取非"来验证,ex.(D)取非,即,"chief executive可以从其它方面获得信息",则,原题less well informed的情形就无法成立.故(D)为假设.(E)是无关选项.

作者: light    时间: 2003-10-26 15:01
198. A factory was trying out a new process for producing one of its products, with the goal of reducing production costs. A trial production run using the new process showed a 15 percent reduction in costs compared with past performance using the standard process. The production managers therefore concluded that the new process did produce a cost savings.

Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the production manager’s conclusion?


weaken the conclusion:the new process did produce a cost savings.

(D) Although some of the factory’s managers have been arguing that the product is outdated and ought to be redesigned, the use of the new production process does not involve any changes in the finished product.


(D)无关选项. 和产品是否过时or需要重新设计无关.

(E) Since the new process differs from the standard process only in the way in which the stage of production are organized and ordered, the cost of the materials used in the product is the same in both processes.


(E)无关选项.同時,the cost of the materials is the same,無法weaken the conclusion.
作者: light    时间: 2003-10-26 15:12
#172
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&replyID=54340&ID=8281&skin=1

#203
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&replyID=59248&ID=8893&skin=1

在網頁左上方有個搜索功能,蠻不錯的.
有些xdjm身邊沒有og,把題完整貼出來,也方便討論.
下回標題裡要寫出題號/出處喔

一切順心 ^_____^
作者: zhuzhu1973    时间: 2005-1-24 11:17

og-198,

why B is wrong, doesn't B bring out the reason,other than new process, that contribute to the sucess of the trial,  ?-- so weaken the conclusion.


作者: 携隐    时间: 2005-1-24 12:58

谢谢light把题目贴出来。

楼上各位问问题的XDJM下次请记得把题目贴全。还有,一个题目发一个贴,方便搜索和讨论。谢谢!


作者: 我爱欧洲    时间: 2005-5-15 00:50

B项如何翻译啊:analysis of the trial of the new process showed that the cost reduction during the trial was entirely contributable to a reduction in the umber of finished products rejected by quality control

这个umber是什么?OG的解释说since finding the source of the cost savings shows that the savings were no mere accident  and so reinforces the conclusion.如何理解?


作者: northeuro    时间: 2005-5-29 10:10
以下是引用我爱欧洲在2005-5-15 0:50:00的发言:

B项如何翻译啊:analysis of the trial of the new process showed that the cost reduction during the trial was entirely contributable to a reduction in the umber of finished products rejected by quality control


这个umber是什么?OG的解释说since finding the source of the cost savings shows that the savings were no mere accident  and so reinforces the conclusion.如何理解?



unmber应该是印刷错误,我觉得是number才对,全句意思为:对新流程测试的分析显示测试中对于成本的降低可以直接归因于生产的不合格成品数量的降低。这确实在更深一个层面上解释了为什么新流程确实降低了成本,应该是加强而不是削弱。
作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-7-28 07:49
以下是引用light在2003-10-26 15:01:00的发言:
.

(E)无关选项.同時,the cost of the materials is the same,無法weaken the conclusion.

light认为D和E是无关项,可是OG关于D和E的解释是support, 解释如下:

Choices D and E are incorrect since by emphasizing that certain aspects of the product - its design and raw materials - were the same in the standard process and the new process, these two answer choices SUPPORT, rather than cast doubt on, the conclusion that the process itself produced the saving.

不明白为何是support?


作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-7-30 09:56
UP!
作者: swlfx    时间: 2005-7-31 09:05

D说根据新的流程做出来的最终产品与老产品一样,并没有什么不同;


E说新老流程的唯一不同之处在于组织生产的阶段不同,而在生产过程中所用的材料的成本是一样的。


上边两个选项实际上是排除了原文结论被削弱的可能,即可能因为是产品本身不同了或者产品所用的成本改变了,才导致成本下降的。


也就是说,通过排除它因,支持了原文的观点。


OPEN TO DISCUSS。


作者: swlfx    时间: 2005-7-31 09:05

D说根据新的流程做出来的最终产品与老产品一样,并没有什么不同;


E说新老流程的唯一不同之处在于组织生产的阶段不同,而在生产过程中所用的材料的成本是一样的。


上边两个选项实际上是排除了原文结论被削弱的可能,即可能因为是产品本身不同了或者产品所用的成本改变了,才导致成本下降的。


也就是说,通过排除它因,支持了原文的观点。


OPEN TO DISCUSS。


作者: cg    时间: 2005-8-4 11:31
以下是引用snowjing在2005-7-28 7:49:00的发言:


light认为D和E是无关项,可是OG关于D和E的解释是support, 解释如下:

Choices D and E are incorrect since by emphasizing that certain aspects of the product - its design and raw materials - were the same in the standard process and the new process, these two answer choices SUPPORT, rather than cast doubt on, the conclusion that the process itself produced the saving.

不明白为何是support?




E) Since the new process differs from the standard process only in the way in which the stage of production are organized and ordered, the cost of the materials used in the product is the same in both processes.

     材料成本相同,在新process让总成本下降15% ->support “the new process did produce a cost savings”

(D) Although some of the factory’s managers have been arguing that the product is outdated and ought to be redesigned, the use of the new production process does not involve any changes in the finished product.

    我也认为是无关选项,哪位NN来解释一下吧!


作者: HHB    时间: 2005-8-26 15:53

关于C我的疑问:

虽然说without benefit of the new process, 但是是不是production costs at the factory for a similar product的下降还是与trial有什么关系呢?如果没有关系的话,为什么会在所有条件不变的情况下,没有理由的下降呢?
作者: HHB    时间: 2005-8-27 10:07
Ding!
作者: gtkiller    时间: 2005-10-14 22:13

还是觉得B对啊,B应该是提出另一种原因吧。请NN解答一下:)


作者: milanforever    时间: 2005-11-11 13:33

My understanding:


Assuming the question wants to weaken the following argument: new process showed 15% cost reduction, compared to old performance of standard process => new process produces cost saving.


B looks like to be an answer mode that other factor (other than new process) causes the cost saving.


However, it is not the case. If it is true, then "the other factor" must have nothing to do with the new process. But, choice B indicates that the result of new process has a connection with the reduced number of rejected finished products. So, choice B is not weaken, but support that the new process has connection with the cost saving caused by reduced number of rejected finished products.


Welcome NN to comment!




作者: milanforever    时间: 2005-11-11 13:44

To make more clear:


The new process makes those finished products. Now, quality control rejects less number of finished products.


So, the new process has a connection with the reduced number of rejected finished products. Thus, "the reduced number of rejected finished products" is not a factor independent out of the new process. It is actually accompanied with the new process.





作者: toeflboy2005    时间: 2006-3-18 05:17

大家认为这是因果题型吗? 可原文并没有说生产过程是唯一原因啊! 为什么还用非A->B 来削弱呢?  


我记得MINDFREE 说过一道题,A->B,用非A-B来削弱不好,实在没有办法才选,如OG131,这题是这样吗?


作者: jandjshi    时间: 2006-3-24 14:42
ding
作者: amber0919    时间: 2006-4-11 16:19
顶一下.我也分不清到底是不是因果型啊..谁来讲讲.
作者: katie83    时间: 2006-4-19 17:04
以下是引用GiGi在2003-10-25 20:12:00的发言:
有沒有人可以幫我解OG邏輯題目:
#167(E)的答案錯在哪?
#172.#200#203.請解釋(有點不懂ETS的說法)
#198(D)(E)的答案刪除的理由

還請好心的人能儘速幫幫我

198,D无关我觉得,题目说的是降低成本的问题


作者: roric    时间: 2006-8-1 18:40
以下是引用toeflboy2005在2006-3-18 5:17:00的发言:

大家认为这是因果题型吗? 可原文并没有说生产过程是唯一原因啊! 为什么还用非A->B 来削弱呢?  

我记得MINDFREE 说过一道题,A->B,用非A-B来削弱不好,实在没有办法才选,如OG131,这题是这样吗?

我觉得这是因果题,原文的推导是A(new process)--->B(reducing costs),原因的唯一性

但并没有用非A---〉B来削弱,因为选项只是提供证明否定new process作为原因,因为没有采取new process的产品也reducing costs了,但没有指出导致其成本降低的其他原因。

不好意思,非A应该就是他因吧

“可原文并没有说生产过程是唯一原因啊!”我觉得对于唯一不唯一的问题,是优先级较低的思路,如果抓着“是不是唯一原因”的原则来判断,很多削弱题就没法做了。像131是明确说了“原因不唯一”这一点的(partly)所以他因不能构成削弱。(好像137-A也是,并且OG10解释明确说了因为原因不唯一排除的,但是原文中并没有暗示词。。。)

继续讨论。。。。。


作者: roric    时间: 2006-8-1 18:48
以下是引用swlfx在2005-7-31 9:05:00的发言:

D说根据新的流程做出来的最终产品与老产品一样,并没有什么不同;

E说新老流程的唯一不同之处在于组织生产的阶段不同,而在生产过程中所用的材料的成本是一样的。

上边两个选项实际上是排除了原文结论被削弱的可能,即可能因为是产品本身不同了或者产品所用的成本改变了,才导致成本下降的。

也就是说,通过排除它因,支持了原文的观点。

OPEN TO DISCUSS。

by emphasizing that certain aspects of product ....were the same
            in the standard process and the new process,these two answer choices support rather than cast doubt.

我的理解是两种方法下的产品什么什么都一样,这种情况下new process还能够节约15%成本,不是应该prefer的吗?故构成支持。思路有所不同,还指教。


作者: hhjc    时间: 2007-9-7 16:28
终于明白咯~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3