ChaseDream

标题: 请问OG11-14 [打印本页]

作者: happycindy79 时间: 2006-12-8 01:24
标题: 请问OG11-14
the commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word “nature”to foods that do not contain color of flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.

the right answer is: E） or anything that has been

my question is: why here it needs use "has been", if there is an answer "or anything", could it be right?

thanks

作者: lsw 时间: 2006-12-17 11:37
标题: 讨论

以下是引用happycindy79在2006-12-8 1:24:00的发言：
the commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word “nature”to foods that do not contain color of flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.

the right answer is: E） or anything that has been

my question is: why here it needs use "has been", if there is an answer "or anything", could it be right?

thank

“HAS BEEN DONG”被动语态。

这里需要使用被动语态。

作者: idwork 时间: 2007-10-3 17:23

以下是引用lsw在2006-12-17 11:37:00的发言：

“HAS BEEN DONG”被动语态。

这里需要使用被动语态。

那么改成"or anything is synthesized" 可否呢？

作者: ranning 时间: 2007-10-3 17:32
不可以，如果是改的话，不是改成or anything is synthesized，而是or anything synthesized

作者: idwork 时间: 2007-10-3 17:39

恩多了动词晕

谢谢啦不过用过去分词也可以表示被动的意思这里可以这样改吗？

作者: ranning 时间: 2007-10-3 17:45
可以啊，这里用完成时我认为是强调的作用啦，强调完成

直接用过去分词也是正确的

作者: idwork 时间: 2007-10-3 17:54

啊~ 梭嘎哈哈明白了

谢谢啦

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)