ChaseDream

标题: 885-S2-12: a和b的差别在哪里? [打印本页]

作者: hedgeforfun 时间: 2003-10-24 21:56
标题: 885-S2-12: a和b的差别在哪里?
12. The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.
(A) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse
(B) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even
(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse
(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse
(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even
答案是b,但我选了a

作者: hedgeforfun 时间: 2003-10-24 23:46
谁帮我找到的题号?版主吗?能不能解答一下下?

作者: gemj 时间: 2003-10-24 23:48
offers like these 当然没有such offers 来得简洁有效。

作者: hedgeforfun 时间: 2003-10-25 00:08
refuse even 和even refuse有分别吗 ?

作者: gemj 时间: 2003-10-25 00:18
我找的。
我想在这里应该没有区别都是even修饰refuse。

作者: mjiehu 时间: 2003-10-25 07:53
offers like these 当然没有such offers 来得简洁有效。
- agree

我想在这里应该没有区别都是even修饰refuse。
- disagree
- the "even" in "even refuse" modifies "refuse"
- the "even" in "refuse even" modifies the "to" phrase

作者: hedgeforfun 时间: 2003-10-25 08:24
真是太感谢了!

作者: gemj 时间: 2003-10-25 10:39

以下是引用mjiehu在2003-10-25 7:53:00的发言：
offers like these 当然没有such offers 来得简洁有效。
- agree

我想在这里应该没有区别都是even修饰refuse。
- disagree
- the "even" in "even refuse" modifies "refuse"
- the "even" in "refuse even" modifies the "to" phrase

有道理，谢谢！

作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-10-25 14:15
在GMAT,like只能用作比较。不能用作例举。

作者: kid 时间: 2004-2-4 19:42
请哪位能帮忙翻译下这句话么？
我怎么看怎么别扭。。

作者: 2love2live 时间: 2004-2-4 21:05
offers like these 是错的，these 指代错误，至少也应该是单数（前面 - a takeover offer)

mjiehu 关于even 的位置有道理,

kid - 我又来滥竽：

公司在被恶意收购时存活的机会小到四例只有一例左右，很多咨询顾问建议防止被恶意收购的第一道防线是甚至连这类存有恶意的电话都不要接。

作者: horsefish 时间: 2004-8-16 11:07
a company’s first line of defense 这种双重所有格在GMAT里应该算错误答案啊, 为什么在答案B中存在呢

作者: LES 时间: 2004-8-16 18:00

以下是引用horsefish在2004-8-16 11:07:00的发言：
a company’s first line of defense 这种双重所有格在GMAT里应该算错误答案啊, 为什么在答案B中存在呢

这个不是双重所有格，

双重所有格的形式是: the first line of a company's

作者: best555tw 时间: 2005-3-2 12:56
such offers 跟 offers like these 除了簡潔或these的指代錯誤外，他們兩個在意義上有什麼差別嗎

作者: peterchang 时间: 2006-9-13 09:50

advise
that a company’s first line of defense in eluding such offers (should) be to refuse even
to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

请问一下，这里的even是什么词性，可以连接to refuse及to take，我查过字典，even不能当连接词，我觉得这里怪怪的

作者: gonghao 时间: 2007-4-2 16:17

advise
that a company’s first line of defense in eluding such offers (should) be to refuse even
to take calls from likely corporate raiders

去掉even，refuse to 。。。。

even修饰的是不定式，甚至是怎么怎么样，应该是副词

作者: lichabrend 时间: 2008-5-6 00:43
to refuse even
to take calls V+ADV+V 想請問這樣的話不會造成even修飾不清的問題嗎? ?

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)