ChaseDream

标题: a更符合并列,为什么不选? [打印本页]

作者: hedgeforfun    时间: 2003-10-24 21:54
标题: a更符合并列,为什么不选?
11.    Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century feminist, called for urban apartment houses including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities.
(A) including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities
(B) that included child-care facilities, and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities
(C) with child-care facilities included and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities
(D) that included child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities
(E) to include child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities included
答案是d,为什么a那么平衡就不选?
作者: gemj    时间: 2003-10-24 23:41
A中的clustered suburban houses前缺for。
D在形式上虽然不对称,但功能上是对称的。
作者: hedgeforfun    时间: 2003-10-24 23:44
for不能省略吗?
把for a and for b写成for a and b不行吗?
什么时候可以省略呢?
作者: kathy72    时间: 2003-10-24 23:49
这里的for 如果省略的话会有歧义.

clustered suburban houses  是和 urban apartment houses 并列 而不是和child-care facilities 并列.
作者: gemj    时间: 2003-10-24 23:50
但在这里,第二个FOR离第一个太远了。
中间的成份太多,没有FOR容易被误认为与其它成份并列。
作者: hedgeforfun    时间: 2003-10-25 00:07
明白了,介词还是少省为妙,对吧?
作者: gemj    时间: 2003-10-25 00:19
尤其是在容易引起误解的时候不能省。
作者: hedgeforfun    时间: 2003-10-25 08:27
有道理

作者: joywzy    时间: 2003-10-25 16:33
为何C和E不行啊?也是并列啊.
作者: kiwiya    时间: 2013-4-5 14:22
gemj 发表于 2003-10-24 23:50
但在这里,第二个FOR离第一个太远了。中间的成份太多,没有FOR容易被误认为与其它成份并列。 ...

nice explanation!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3