ChaseDream
标题: gwd23-2 [打印本页]
作者: yl1004 时间: 2006-12-2 09:54
标题: gwd23-2
Known today by a name they would not have recognized—Anasazi, Navajo for “ancient enemies”—the ancestors of the modern Zuni and Hopi built and then, for reasons still mysterious, abandoned the complex roads and structures of the domain they ruled a millennium ago in the American southwest.
- ancestors of the modern Zuni and Hopi built and then, for reasons still mysterious, abandoned the complex roads and structures of the domain they ruled a millennium ago in the American southwest
- reasons are still mysterious why the ancestors of the modern Zuni and Hopi built and then abandoned the complex roads and structures of the domain they ruled in the American southwest a millennium ago
- modern Zuni and Hopi had ancestors who, a millennium ago, ruled a domain in the American southwest where they built and then abandoned complex roads and structures for still mysterious reasons
- domain of the American southwest was ruled a millennium ago by the ancestors of the modern Zuni and Hopi, who built and then, for reasons still mysterious, abandoned complex roads and structures
- complex roads and structures of the domain that the ancestors of the modern Zuni and Hopi ruled a millennium ago in the American southwest were built and then, for reasons still mysterious, abandoned
顺便问问破折号的用法??是不是破折号中间的东西要和后面的东西表达的东西一致,就象同位语一样?
作者: itokinblue 时间: 2006-12-10 22:10
不是很懂这个题目...这个known和ancestor是什么关系啊???
作者: raikey 时间: 2007-6-5 00:50
这题不理解,谁给翻译一下?
作者: jiaphoe 时间: 2007-6-5 01:43
很容易确定答案A,
因为只有A,Kwown才可以和主句主语the ancestors搭配,是对主语的解释。
作者: raikey 时间: 2007-6-5 02:09
...—Anasazi, Navajo for “ancient enemies”—... 怎么解释?
其中的for又是什么用法?
作者: jiaphoe 时间: 2007-6-5 02:17
Navajo for “ancient enemies 是对 Anasazi的解释。
Navajo指某种民族或语言的意思。
Anasazi:用Navajo语来说就是古代敌人的意思
作者: raikey 时间: 2007-6-5 12:00
ah,原来如此,这下通了:
...Anasazi,纳瓦霍人(美国最大的印第安部落)语中的"古敌人"...
谢谢楼上指点.
麻烦楼上高人再看一下TTGWD23-13,http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=202765&page=1,我的贴在13楼.
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-5 12:03:19编辑过]
作者: colorful_na 时间: 2007-7-9 15:12
kan
作者: yzhao26 时间: 2008-5-22 11:13
up
作者: lichabrend 时间: 2008-5-28 01:06
up
作者: lichabrend 时间: 2008-8-21 22:22
up
作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2008-11-4 09:04
A里面a millennium ago是不是应该放在in the American southwest后面更合适呢,我查了好几本语法书都说惯例是地点放在时间状语前面的..还是GMAT并不注重这个?求解..
作者: brass20y 时间: 2008-11-27 10:52
nan
作者: yzhao26 时间: 2009-2-23 11:09
up
作者: visavi 时间: 2009-6-7 12:05
这个破折号以后代表的应该是是人啊?
作者: AlienX 时间: 2009-6-7 12:25
一個term/稱呼
作者: skigorush 时间: 2009-7-27 19:32
作者: cymissiloveu 时间: 2009-8-5 19:14
up
作者: Oyster+gmat 时间: 2009-8-26 19:35
...by a name they...
说明主语是复数 并且在逻辑上符合意思 那就是a
作者: VeniceBingo 时间: 2009-9-22 23:22
两破折号之间的内容应该是可以省略的,A中the ancestores of ...做have recognized的宾语.
其他选项都有个BE,跟前面的HAVE RECOGNIZED合起来就是双谓语,显然错了,然后逻辑上也很混乱.
作者: violetwangxx 时间: 2010-11-16 17:09
是不是这样啊,they 指代 the ancestors; recognize的宾语是 a name;
Known today bya namethey would not have recognized—Anasazi, Navajo for “ancient enemies”—the ancestors of the modern Zuni and Hopi built and then, for reasons still mysterious, abandoned the complex roads and structures of the domain they ruled a millennium ago in the American southwest.
即:The ancestors of the modern Zuni and Hopi, known tday by a name they would not have recognized —Anasazi, Navajo for “ancient enemies”— built and then, for reasons.....
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |