(The following was excerpted from material written in 1988.)
For over a decade the
most common policy advice
given to developing countries
Line
by international development
(5) institutions has been to copy
the export-oriented path of the
newly industrializing countries,
the celebrated NIC’s. These
economies—
(10)
burst into the world manufac-
turing market in the late
and the
(15) six economies, along with
enjoyed unequaled growth
rates for gross national product
and for exports, with exports
accounting for 70 percent of
(20) the developing world’s manu-
factured exports. It was,
therefore, not surprising that
dozens of other countries
attempted to follow their model,
(25) yet no countries—with the pos-
sible exceptions of
and
approached their success. In
“No More NIC’s,” Robin Broad
(30) and John Cavanagh search for
the reasons behind these fail-
ures, identifying far-reaching
changes in the global econ-
omy—from synthetic substitutes
(35)
for commodity exports to
unsustainable levels of foreign
debt—as responsible for a glut
economy offering little room for
new entrants. Despite these
(40) changes, the authors maintain,
the World Bank and the Inter-
national Monetary Fund—the
foremost international devel-
opment institutions—have
(45) continued to promote the NIC
path as the way for heavily
indebted developing countries
to proceed. And yet the futility
of this approach should,
(50) according to the authors, be
all too apparent so many years
into a period of reduced growth
in world markets.
Q36:
The author of the passage most clearly implies that Broad and Cavanagh disagree with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund about which of the following?
请问这题的文章对应位置在哪 我胡乱选了个C
另外下面这句话(Line34~Line37)是在说什麽?
from synthetic substitutes for commodity exports to unsustainable levels of foreign debt
麻烦大家帮忙一下 谢谢
一点拙见，不知当否：
1、40行开始到最后；
2、是说那些没有成功转型的发展中国家之所以失败的原因：从出口商品的综合替代品到这些国家的不可维持的外债水平。
这是本月JJ吗?
一点拙见，不知当否：
1、40行开始到最后；
2、是说那些没有成功转型的发展中国家之所以失败的原因：从出口商品的综合替代品到这些国家的不可维持的外债水平。
了解了
謝謝熱心的seraphh 感激不盡阿
to sigrid920 mm
好像不是
不用客气，互相帮助。
Despite these
changes, the authors maintain,
the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund—the
foremost international development institutions—have
continued to promote the NIC
path as the way for heavily
indebted developing countries
to proceed.
WB和IMF仍旧在给高强度外债的发展中国家使用NIC path，（代表上面两个人是不认同这种做法的）
【总结】题目问这两个人不同意WB和IMF的哪个做法？注意但这里需要对NIC path进行一个前文的回找。文章一开头就说了“copy
the
export-oriented path of”即NIC path是以出口为导向的做法。所以这两个人反对WB和IMF在于：继续对高外债发展中国家使用export-oriented path. 而C迷惑选项，“发展中国家应该维持外债水平”只是字面上很像，没有深入到他们反对的重点（NIC path）
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |