ChaseDream

标题: [讨论]GWD13-1 [打印本页]

作者: wzwjennifer 时间: 2006-11-22 12:14
标题: [讨论]GWD13-1

GWD-13-1

Although she had been known as an effective legislator first in the Texas Senate and later in the United States House of Representatives, not until Barbara Jordan’s participation in the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon in 1974 was she made a nationally recognized figure, as it was televised nationwide.

later in the United States House of Representatives, not until Barbara Jordan’s participation in the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon in 1974 was she made a nationally recognized figure, as it was
later in the United States House of Representatives, Barbara Jordan did not become a nationally recognized figure until 1974, when she participated in the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, which were
later in the Untied States House of Representatives, it was not until 1974 that Barbara Jordan became a nationally recognized figure, with her participation in the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, which was
then also later in the United States House of Representatives, not until 1974 did Barbara Jordan become a nationally recognized figure, as she participated in the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, being
then also later in the United States House of Representatives, Barbara Jordan did not become a nationally recognized figure until 1974, when she participated in the hearings on the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, which was

我选C，答案是B，觉得B的语气减弱了，而且which were也不对阿

作者: Fisherman 时间: 2006-11-22 15:04

"which were" 修饰 "hearings", 所以应该用 were. C 不对，因为C用了 which was

作者: wzwjennifer 时间: 2006-11-22 15:22
which难道可以修饰那么远的 hearings么，不是应该就近修饰的么，虽然我觉得从意思上将不通，可是语法当中which可以跳跃修饰这么远的东西么

作者: 阳光小石子 时间: 2007-1-7 13:22
which倒底可不可以修饰那么远啊? 照OG的说法好象不行啊.

作者: mbz 时间: 2007-1-7 13:41

以下是引用阳光小石子在2007-1-7 13:22:00的发言：
which倒底可不可以修饰那么远啊? 照OG的说法好象不行啊.

No problem, as long as there is no misunderstanding.

"hearings" is clearing the only plural in the context, so B is correct.

作者: hxurong 时间: 2008-10-16 13:49
A项倒装句为什么错呢？

作者: Brilliance 时间: 2009-7-30 20:50
。

作者: redhat158 时间: 2010-1-8 16:19
标题: 同問A要怎麼改?
A?

作者: redhat158 时间: 2010-1-9 16:42
标题: up

作者: JNash 时间: 2010-1-9 16:54
which 的限制主要应该是不能修饰整句话，因为是非限定性定语从句。至于修饰谁则最好离得近，但是你得读题的逻辑。不是控告impeachment 被全国播放，而是hearings（听证，也就是过堂）被全国播放，控告你上法庭就完了，麻烦的是法庭上的听证。
我更不确定的是好像then also不能存在，是否？

作者: wynn123 时间: 2010-1-9 23:46
由于she开头，她只能指代第一个出现的主语，所以后面只能是BJ，其它选项ACD都错了~至于E的错误，一个是由于在这里was变成修饰impeachment了，其实应该修饰hearings听证会的，所以要改成were，另外一个是因为E里的then与later重复了~
后半句意思是说她参加了关于总统RX的弹劾的听证会，这个听证会被全国电视播出。

作者: 逆水潜龙 时间: 2011-11-16 14:29
补充一点，E中and和also都是连词，不可连用·

作者: airphone 时间: 2012-4-4 10:55

解释非常好！

作者: W.H.Y 时间: 2016-9-9 11:15
A.倒装句是没错, 但是as it was语义不对. 应当表述"听证会"是通过全国电视播放的, 而不是"全国知名人士". 故排除.

B.WHICH可以限定离它较远的hearings.
WHICH不可限定整句, 只能限定NOUN或NOUN+PREP PHRASE. 且NOUN+PREP PHRASE是WHICH唯一能够限定的NOUN+MODIFIER形式.
这道题hearings on the (i...) in (R...) in (1...)是NOUN+PREP PHRASE, 且中心成分是hearings, hearings是复数形式, 所以which从句要用复数, 既系动词用"were".
所以关于WHICH是否应该就近修饰的问题, 答案是应该. 只是要看是NOUN还是NOUN+PREP PHRASE, 如果是后者, 确实需要越过PREP PHRASE去限定作为中心成分的NOUN. 这应该和OG不冲突.
此乃正解.

C. 用with以后, 表达的含义稍有区别. 应当表述当她参与了听证会, 她才成为了知名人士. with表示的"A发生伴随B发生"和when表示的"当B发生时, A发生"有区别.
另外应当表述听证会是全国直播. 但此处which was限定的是participation, 强调她对听证会的参与是全国直播的. 句意又有了一点差别.
故排除.

D. 有later就不用then了, 也不需要用also了. 这些词表示同样的词义, 不需要堆叠出现. as..., being...对于句意传达的改变和C中的with..., which was...类似. 故排除.

E. 几个"然后"堆叠出现和D一样. 另外which was要么限定的是impeachment, 这个语义不通, 因为hearings是被电视直播的主题, impeachment是hearings的主题, 说明impeachment是被调查的对象, 那么impeachment是已经发生过的, 不应该被直播; 要么which was限定的是hearings, 那么复数名词对应了单数动词, 单复数不匹配. 故排除.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)