Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?
是否我理解上有不准的地方,请指教:
Guidebook writer用这句话表示原因:
Guidebook writer用这句话表示原因:
...hotels ...that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.
...hotels ...that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.
比较的是:
修建于1930前和后不同宾馆内部的the quality of the original carpentry work -------注意两个built的修饰对象,都是hotels。 请仔细阅读,没有提供fall into disuse and be demolished的任何线索--------修建不同宾馆和对同一宾馆的维修是两码事。 请仔细阅读,没有提供fall into disuse and be demolished的任何线索--------修建不同宾馆和对同一宾馆的维修是两码事。
修建于1930前和后不同宾馆内部的the quality of the original carpentry work -------注意两个built的修饰对象,都是hotels。 请仔细阅读,没有提供fall into disuse and be demolished的任何线索--------修建不同宾馆和对同一宾馆的维修是两码事。
请仔细阅读,没有提供fall into disuse and be demolished的任何线索--------修建不同宾馆和对同一宾馆的维修是两码事。
然而:D,表达的是同一宾馆内部的情况。好就持久,不好才需要修------是针对同一宾馆而言。所以个人感觉与原文原因线索相偏,没落入scope,排除。
本题个人选择B,more guests 所以more 磨损。但又感觉多推了一步。
本题个人选择B,more guests 所以more 磨损。但又感觉多推了一步。
作何理解才正确?请大N赐教!
作何理解才正确?请大N赐教!
抱歉!!
不知什么原因,相同的文字老是出现两行。编辑了两次,都没成功。
抱歉!!
不知什么原因,相同的文字老是出现两行。编辑了两次,都没成功。
您可以把内容COPY到NOPEPAD里面,再从NOTEPAD里面贴入论坛,就好了。
D is right.
More people staying in the hotel doesn't mean the originality should be compromised.
"Disuse and be demolished" will make the things lose their original quality.
多谢,似乎了理解了!
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |