A survey by the National Council of Churches showed that in 1986 there were 20,736 female ministers, almost 9 percent of the nation's clergy, twice as much as 1977.
A. twice as much as 1977
B. twice as many as 1977
C. double what it was in 1977
D. double the figure for 1977
E. a number double that of 1977's 可能这个问题很弱,没办法,我基础本来就弱。但是如果有疑问不问,就是对自己不负责任。 还请各位不要笑偶 我想问的是:为什么D选项要用for,如果改成in可以吗?
可能这个问题很弱,没办法,我基础本来就弱。但是如果有疑问不问,就是对自己不负责任。
还请各位不要笑偶
我想问的是:为什么D选项要用for,如果改成in可以吗?
同问这个问题 顶起来
这个问题我也没弄懂,不过刚才查了很久,理解如下:
1 弄清楚句子的结构:原句中:in 1986 there were 20,736 female ministers, twice as much as 1977是主干,“almost 9 percent of the nation's clergy, ”是插入语。
2
3 for 此处表是比较。
朗文解释:double是predeterminer,像THE,HIS。。。一样。例句the value of his house is double what it was.
原句同位结构省略IS。
A survey by the National Council of Churches showed that in 1986 there were 20,736 female ministers, almost 9 percent of the nation's clergy, twice as much as 1977.
A. twice as much as 1977
B. twice as many as 1977
C. double what it was in 1977
D. double the figure for 1977
E. a number double that of 1977's 不知道可不可以这做:1.由于almost引导的句子由一对逗号引起来了,所以看做插入语可以省掉不看,所以后面的部分应该修饰主句或其中的某一个部分。根据句意是来修饰femali ministers的,所以由可数名词排除了A,
不知道可不可以这做:1.由于almost引导的句子由一对逗号引起来了,所以看做插入语可以省掉不看,所以后面的部分应该修饰主句或其中的某一个部分。根据句意是来修饰femali ministers的,所以由可数名词排除了A,
2.B中没有介词,违背了平行一致的原则
3.E中的双重所有格错
本人不明白CD选项:疑惑有几个
1.既然double在此处做限定词,adv.为什么不能加what it was?是单纯的因为不简洁吗?还是因为it指代不明确?五楼例句中说过double what it was ...为什么就可以??
2.为什么the figure for 1977 对?不应该改成in 1977 吗?有什么特殊目的吗?还是说无论in 还是 for都对?
3.什么时候用twice什么时候用double
twice as many as sth 是比较的标准句型,如果没有合适的选项则可选double?这样的解释可以吗?
A survey by the National Council of Churches showed that in 1986 there were 20,736 female ministers, almost 9 percent of the nation's clergy, twice as much as 1977.
A. twice as much as 1977
B. twice as many as 1977
C. double what it was in 1977
D. double the figure for 1977
E. a number double that of 1977's 不知道可不可以这做:1.由于almost引导的句子由一对逗号引起来了,所以看做插入语可以省掉不看,所以后面的部分应该修饰主句或其中的某一个部分。根据句意是来修饰femali ministers的,所以由可数名词排除了A,
不知道可不可以这做:1.由于almost引导的句子由一对逗号引起来了,所以看做插入语可以省掉不看,所以后面的部分应该修饰主句或其中的某一个部分。根据句意是来修饰femali ministers的,所以由可数名词排除了A,
2.B中没有介词,违背了平行一致的原则
3.E中的双重所有格错
本人不明白CD选项:疑惑有几个
1.既然double在此处做限定词,adv.为什么不能加what it was?是单纯的因为不简洁吗?还是因为it指代不明确?五楼例句中说过double what it was ...为什么就可以??
2.为什么the figure for 1977 对?不应该改成in 1977 吗?有什么特殊目的吗?还是说无论in 还是 for都对?
3.什么时候用twice什么时候用double
twice as many as sth 是比较的标准句型,如果没有合适的选项则可选double?这样的解释可以吗?
这题讨论的好热啊,我也说下我的看法,仅供参考啊
主句:A survey showed that in 1986 there were 20736 female ministers,twice as much as 1977.(double the figure for 1977)
1 the figure对应的是20736 female ministers; almost 9 percent...是对前面一句话的补充,插入语,在此题中可以删去不看,大体意思我没理解明白,是说 20736 female ministers 中有9%是clergy 还是 说 20376 female ministers 这些人数大学时clergy的9%,反正是不需要看的一句话 就像是 “这里有100个苹果,10个是绿苹果,苹果的数量是梨的数量的两倍”说不说那十个绿苹果都没有关系
2 数字与数字的对比,划线部分应给出1977年的什么与前面相对比,所以A,B都不对,少东西
3 有几个关于倍数的用法
a 倍数+ as...as eg :ten times as big as
b 倍数+比较级 eg :twice more than
c 倍数+名词 eg :twice the number
个人理解twice 和double 可以互换
4 much 修饰不可数 题中 20736 female ministers 是可数,所以不可以用 as much as ,可换成as many as
5 E选项又of 又's的,重复,不对,另外,数字不能自己double而是被double (og解释)
6 至于C&D,不知道怎么说了,个人理解就是D比C简洁,并且C中it 指代不清
这样排除看来就选D了,幸好题中没有 double the figure in 1977 or twice the number in 1977 个人觉得都一样,望指正:)
说了一堆,发现 LZ的问题还是没有答案,我也不知道 这个题中为什么用FOR,另外for 与 in 是否可以替换(for 1977 改为 in 1977 是不是也对?)
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |