ChaseDream

标题: GWD 30-28 [打印本页]

作者: kaori110 时间: 2006-11-16 18:29
标题: GWD 30-28

1. GWD-30-Q28

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered.
                        Presently, no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified.
                            Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant a conclusion that has been drawn by some commentators:
                        that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious. Clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.
The first is claim that has been used to support a position that the argument accepts; the second is a position that the argument rejects.
The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning the accuracy of the finding.
The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning one alleged implication.
The first is a finding, the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second is an objection that has been raised against the explanation that the argument defends.

這題答案是D 總覺得C 也可以ㄚ

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-11-16 18:31:37编辑过]

作者: Sacramento_CA 时间: 2007-5-19 16:56

C.The first is a finding
whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning the accuracy of the finding.

至少划线部分就不对了吧，觉得文章没打算评价BF(1)呢，ho ho~~~

作者: s_huang 时间: 2007-7-18 10:49

文章中有evaluate到底是不是twice啊?这不是evaluate accuarcy吗?请指教

作者: benja 时间: 2007-7-18 17:54

The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning the accuracy of the finding.

觉得这个划线部分有问题，应该是关于 some commentators提出的一个conclusion。而不是第一张黑脸所指的issue。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)