标题: 为什么不用which means? [打印本页] 作者: hedgeforfun 时间: 2003-10-22 10:33 标题: 为什么不用which means? 1. Not all employment selection mechanisms that have a “disparate effect,” that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to their presence in the relevant labor market, are unlawful. (A) that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to (B) which means, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with (C) which means, that screen out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with (D) that is, that screen out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to (E) that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with 为什么不用which means? 说说为什么选d?
作者: gemj 时间: 2003-10-22 10:47 http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&replyID=114768&id=16821&star=1&skin=0作者: kathy72 时间: 2003-10-22 11:29
that is 是插入语, that screen .....定语从句修饰mechanisms , 如果换成 which means, that...变成means 的宾语从句了, 而且, 就算是宾语从句, 中间也不应加逗号呀.作者: hedgeforfun 时间: 2003-10-22 12:22
謝謝啦!gemj兄,可以可以再說說independently of 和independent from的區別? 我還是搞不清作者: miejue 时间: 2003-10-22 14:34
比较一下 independently of united states 和 independent from England 的区别就很好办啦