tt gwd 15-38 搜索了目前为止没有好的解答和结论 - ChaseDream

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

以下是引用pinkcutie在2006-11-12 20:56:00的发言：

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.

题干: 很多州的城镇都有禁烟法令，一份被冠以“要求全州推广禁烟法”的请愿书被分发到投票人手中，而只被问及“你是否愿意签署这份全州推广禁烟令的请愿书”。这份请愿书的真正目的是要求州法律在零售或者政府服务等向公众开放的部门禁烟。
问题：下列何种情况会使投票人产生“将地方法令推广到全州”的误解

分析：
要使投票人的这一误解成立，必须满足条件即，州法律会沿用目前的地方法令，不做更改，如果州法律会更改或取代目前的地方法令，那么就不可能产生“将地方法令推广到全州”的误解

所以答案E：The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.

州法律不会影响现存的地方禁烟法令。。。。。应该是最合适的

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters [who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide]?

That means which of the following will mislead the voters who has gotten the the proposal understood as the local ordinances statewide.

Choice C in which says that state will deter the local laws which are much stronger and stricter than state laws.That means the level of limition will decrease not increase,such as extending the local ordinaces statewide.

That means which of the following will mislead the voters who has gotten the the proposal understood as the local ordinances statewide.

楼上的认为是这些人有这样的想法，误导就是和他们的想法相反，所以选C

我觉得如果按照楼上的思路问题应该是Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading voters [who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide]? misleading 后面不应该加“to”

而实际问题是Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters [who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide]? 是误导成为怎样的人。

As the question cited in the argument,“Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” ,all the people asked will have a clear picture of proposal that will be extended to statewide.

I think both the title of the petition and the question asked by the campaign worker misled the voters to understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

求NN啊，我后天就考了，这题我读了N遍，应该就是C啊！！！！

make petition misleading（adj)是一个make sth adj.的固定搭配，意为使sth易被误解。to voter who... 意为对voter而言。这个问题问的是，对于认为州法案是地方法案的扩展的人来说，下列哪个情况使得请愿书（petition as circulated)是误导的。

对于这个情况，voter们是不知道的。题目说了因为他们认为州法案是对地方法案的扩展，所以他们理所当然认为请愿书的意思就是支持地方法扩展为州法。但是这个情况的发生使得州法案不是地方法案的扩展，所以才会造成他们对请愿书的认识是误解。

E选项说州法不会影响地方法中的一些现行规定，所以会有两种可能：一是州法与地方法一致，二是地方法中的这些规定，州法中不加以限制。如果是情况一，“州法是地方法的扩展执行”仍可能成立。所以E 不一定造成误解。

voter们认为：州法是地方法的扩展，所以他们认为请愿书的“支持州法”就是“支持扩展地方法为州法”的意思。

题目说这个请愿书对于认为州法是地方法扩展的人而言，是易被误解的。也就是认为“支持州法”等于支持“地方法扩展为州法”的认识是错误的。即州法不是地方法的扩展。