ChaseDream

标题: GWD21-Q28: 傻傻的问 [打印本页]
作者: shanexwang    时间: 2006-11-10 15:47
标题: GWD21-Q28: 傻傻的问

    

 GWD21-Q28:


    

Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top
executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors,
who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial
collapse, have been greatly relieved. 
They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the
bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false.  They might well be overoptimistic,
however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own
company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s
health.


    

 


    

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions
play which of the following roles?


    

 


    
  1. The
         first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question
         by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument
         relies.
  2. The
         first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question
         by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by
         that evidence.
  3. The
         first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning
         called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that
         undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.
  4. The
         first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning
         called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of
         the argument.
  5. The
         first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning
         called into question by the argument; the second states a further
         conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.这道题怎么看都是B, 答案怎么是啊A?

作者: shanexwang    时间: 2006-11-10 23:41
sth wrong with the ans?
作者: lukewang1983    时间: 2006-11-11 13:21
我没有做过这个题目,但是觉得A是对的呀。你说说为什么不对呢？

文章如是说
银行高管对银行的股票进行回购，人们对银行倒闭的传言也就随之驱散。人们的理由是那些高管在银行很有威望和信誉（连他们都买自己的股票），那些谣言肯定是不真实的。人们过分乐观了呀，但是那些高管只是算计着用回购股票这招驱散对银行健康发展不利的谣言。

选项A说，1是正面，2 是说反面。。。很对呀。。。
选项B说， 2是对1的支持。。。好像不是很对呀。。。
请NN指点
作者: shanexwang    时间: 2006-11-17 23:12
2 is a position that the arguer holds, i think, so could be called intermedia conclusion, but there 's no evidence.
作者: ambrosecelin    时间: 2008-3-23 15:15
up
作者: 时间的沙漏    时间: 2008-7-6 18:55
UP
作者: 时间的沙漏    时间: 2008-7-6 19:33

我的答案是D 啊 

TN-24版本的

但是我也选A

作者: levenliu    时间: 2008-9-4 16:00

应该是D

A.      The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.  第二个不是证据，而是作者的结论，也是全文的结论

D：    The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

作者: yuminjia    时间: 2009-1-9 23:00
以下是引用shanexwang在2006-11-10 15:47:00的发言：

 

 GWD21-Q28:


 

Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top
executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors,
who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial
collapse, have been greatly relieved. 
They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the
bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false.  They might well be overoptimistic,
however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own
company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s
health.


 

 


 

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions
play which of the following roles?


 

 

答案是D

想问第一个BF，since后面不是论据吗（evidence）D的说法是说第一个BF是提出下面质疑的中间结论 这里不太明白（虽然A的第2个BF解释是错误的）

盼NN指点

作者: fogwind    时间: 2009-1-10 00:07

top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness 当然是 several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank 所推出的结论。

你仔细看看，高管对银行有信心 如何可以成为证据。证据是要客观事实的。

作者: yuminjia    时间: 2009-1-11 13:33
以下是引用fogwind在2009-1-10 0:07:00的发言：

top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness 当然是 several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank 所推出的结论。

你仔细看看，高管对银行有信心 如何可以成为证据。证据是要客观事实的。

还是有点不太明白 they reason that 的that指谣言relieved。而谣言relieve的论据就是高管对自己的银行有信心啊 难道论据不能是抽象的论述吗

做这个题目的时候也受到BF题的快速解题方法的影响 因为觉得reason后面就是表原因的论据 所以是evidence

有点糊涂了 还盼NN指点

作者: cuishang11    时间: 2009-7-2 20:42
题目似乎有些问题
作者: raphael1234    时间: 2009-7-3 20:16

up

作者: pwss    时间: 2009-7-30 23:49
作者: elaine1031    时间: 2009-8-2 10:16
up
作者: sunny8843    时间: 2009-8-4 23:22
up
作者: vivian128    时间: 2009-8-4 23:53
up
作者: mars_cheung    时间: 2009-10-24 01:50

看清楚第一个 BF:They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness,  reason 这里是动词，因此这里是推理的过程，而不是证据，所以排除 A   B

第二个 BF：They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate... 明显这才是主论点

因此选 D

作者: slamshady    时间: 2010-5-13 20:05
这题目第一遍大概很难做对，看到since就忽略第一个黑脸到底谢什么了。。。。。
作者: cathiejxj    时间: 2010-6-29 08:46
我怀疑这道题黑体在后面those worrisome rumors must be false上，题目可能有错
作者: azure0520    时间: 2010-7-7 16:11
同意楼上的，记得TN里面有道BF题就是黑体字标错了。。。
作者: Oliviajobs    时间: 2011-4-18 08:14
看了一些讨论， 试着总结一下
首先明确一个概念，能做evidence的一定是客观存在，不能是主管能动,主管能送可以是reason.
原文的简化LOR:    因为高管买股票（evidence), 投资者认为高管这么做是因为对公司有信心（intermediate conclusion），所以投资者释然了（main conclusion supposed to be opposed by author).   因为有可能高管扮猪吃老虎(reason)，所以投资者过分乐观（main conclusion).  
ANS: D  
其他选项的方向不正确。、
作者: Catherine0301    时间: 2011-5-4 15:53
楼上正解！
作者: 璐璐Grace    时间: 2011-6-6 23:31
谢谢！  受教了！
作者: antdefender    时间: 2011-9-29 00:15
但是这道题OG12上给的答案是A啊,虽然我自己选的也是D,而且看不懂答案到底再说什么..求解释
D： the second statement is not itself offered as an xiplanation of why these bank executives are investing in the bank; if it were, that would mean that the bank executives are doing so because corporate executives are known to do such thikngs in a calculated effort to dispel worries. Futhermore the argument does not conclude that this other explanation( which the boldfaced portion points to) is correct, only that the one inferred by depositors may not be.
作者: myaska    时间: 2011-10-6 22:08
OG12上的题我做过两遍好像没见到过这道题啊？
作者: 大笑丸子    时间: 2012-2-6 16:36
top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness 当然是 several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank 所推出的结论。
你仔细看看，高管对银行有信心 如何可以成为证据。证据是要客观事实的。
-- by 会员 fogwind (2009/1/10 0:07:00)


这个把证据和事实分得很清楚嘛～
作者: duankou    时间: 2012-8-19 01:47
OG黑体部分不一样啊
OG：
Since it has become known that several of a bank’s
top executives have been buying shares in their
own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been
worried by rumors that the bank faced impending
fi nancial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They
reason that, since top executives evidently have faith
in the bank’s fi nancial soundness, those worrisome
rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be
overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives
have been known to buy shares in their own
company in a calculated attempt to dispel
negative rumors about the company’s health.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play
which of the following roles?
(A) The fi rst describes evidence that has been taken
as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a
reason for questioning that support.
(B) The fi rst describes evidence that has been taken
as supporting a conclusion; the second states a
contrary conclusion that is the main conclusion
of the argument.
(C) The fi rst provides evidence in support of the
main conclusion of the argument; the second
states that conclusion.
(D) The fi rst describes the circumstance that the
argument as a whole seeks to explain; the
second gives the explanation that the argument
seeks to establish.
(E) The fi rst describes the circumstance that the
argument as a whole seeks to explain; the
second provides evidence in support of the
explanation that the argument seeks to
establish.

What is the role that the two boldfaced portions play in the argument? Th e first boldfaced
portion states that bank executives are buying bank shares, which the passage indicates is
taken by bank depositors to be evidence of the executives’ faith in the bank. （高管买股是evidence）The passage
then tells us what some have inferred from this, and finally off ers in the second boldfaced
statement evidence that undermines this inference.
A Correct. Th is option correctly identifi es the roles played by the boldfaced portions.
B Th is correctly describes the fi rst statement’s role, but the second statement is not off ered as a
conclusion—no evidence is given for it; rather it is evidence for something else.
C Again, the second statement is not off ered as a conclusion; no evidence is given for it.
D Th e second statement is not itself off ered as an explanation of why these bank executives are
investing in the bank; if it were, that would mean that the bank executives are doing so because
corporate executives are known to do such things in a calculated eff ort to dispel worries.
Furthermore the argument does not conclude that this other explanation (which the boldfaced
portion points to) is correct, only that the one inferred by depositors may not be.
E Again, the argument is not so much seeking to establish an explanation of its own as it is trying
to undermine that inferred by the depositors.
Th e correct answer is A.



欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3