ChaseDream

标题: [求助]885-01-24 [打印本页]

作者: dc    时间: 2003-10-19 16:24
标题: [求助]885-01-24
885-01-24. Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during two decades, stringent rationing and planned distribution have allowed the People’s Republic of China to ensure nutritional levels of 2,000 calories per person per day for its population.
(A) Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during
(B) Even though its per capita food supply has hardly increased in
(C) Despite its per capita food supply hardly increasing over
(D) Despite there being hardly any increase in its per capita food supply during
(E) Although there is hardly any increase in per capita food supply for

What's wrong with (E)
还有,Even though 和 Although 的用法有什么不同 ?
作者: albertjerry    时间: 2003-10-19 16:40
很明显时态错了啊    ,应该用现在时    因为是   for two decades
作者: samsonerin    时间: 2003-11-16 22:16
以下是引用dc在2003-10-19 16:24:00的发言:
885-01-24. Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during two decades, stringent rationing and planned distribution have allowed the People’s Republic of China to ensure nutritional levels of 2,000 calories per person per day for its population.
(A) Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during
(B) Even though its per capita food supply has hardly increased in
(C) Despite its per capita food supply hardly increasing over
(D) Despite there being hardly any increase in its per capita food supply during
(E) Although there is hardly any increase in per capita food supply for

What's wrong with (E)

我本来也是选e,后来看了大侠的解释后,知道应该要用完成式;不过这里的a、b选项,会不会有修饰语误置的问题,也就是even though所带的句子好像变成修饰stringent rationing and planned的味道。请指教!
还有,Even though 和 Although 的用法有什么不同 ?

作者: iselibra    时间: 2003-11-17 00:03
E:there be在gmat中很少用,往往表示自然存在;for two decades要用完城市
作者: egretxm    时间: 2004-8-29 03:09

请解释一下为什么A 不对, 谢谢!


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-29 3:21:32编辑过]

作者: scots    时间: 2004-8-30 00:06
以下是引用egretxm在2004-8-29 3:09:00的发言:

请解释一下为什么A 不对, 谢谢!

A的时态不对!既不符合该从句中现在完成时的时间标志词“during two decades”,也不跟主句中“have allowed”的时态一致!



作者: davidcopper    时间: 2004-11-4 11:24
这题做时很快选到E,因为主句主语是ration ang distribution, 从句its food supply好象会产生很明显的illogical referent, 还是因为主句主语是复数,所以可以消除模糊指代?
作者: nickt    时间: 2005-5-7 20:45
E的错误在于时态。B的its 是不是因为主句的主语和谓语的关系明确,且句末有“for its population”,这样就可以在从句中用its 指代PRC’s ?
作者: IceOnMe    时间: 2005-5-28 23:18

同问上一楼的问题


AB 的its 和主句的主语无关么?


Even though its per capita food supply has hardly increased in two decades, stringent rationing and planned distribution have allowed the People’s Republic of China to ensure nutritional levels of 2,000 calories per person per day for its population.


我把its指rationing and distrbution 作为指代逻辑错误, 以及主句谓语have ...复数形式作为排除AB的依据了 : (


作者: eSpirit    时间: 2005-6-21 23:40

请教一下NN,B中的its应该指代谁呢?从逻辑上看应该是PRC。但是可以这样指代吗?不是说从句中的代词是优先指代主句主语的吗?这里的PRC是作了allow的宾语啊!!


作者: eSpirit    时间: 2005-6-22 20:37
顶一下
作者: lindazhou    时间: 2005-7-4 19:37
same question. pls help me
作者: tania    时间: 2005-7-4 21:31
以下是引用eSpirit在2005-6-21 23:40:00的发言:

请教一下NN,B中的its应该指代谁呢?从逻辑上看应该是PRC。但是可以这样指代吗?不是说从句中的代词是优先指代主句主语的吗?这里的PRC是作了allow的宾语啊!!



欧不是nn,只能跟你讲一下自己的看法,仅供参考。


its是指代PRC,因为主句的主语是stringent rationing and planned distribution,是复数,所以这里用its指代PRC不存在歧义。


作者: likui    时间: 2005-8-14 14:08
顶!逻辑主语存在问题呀。
作者: eSpirit    时间: 2005-9-25 18:26
再顶一下
作者: brissa    时间: 2005-9-30 23:17

another question.


Shouldn't  "in two decades"  use futer tense?


For example, He will come back in ten minutes.


Therefore, I think C is much better than B.


作者: weichenli    时间: 2005-10-10 13:42

是因為Even though不像unlike 有那麼嚴謹的對秤要求嗎??



還有像 22 題的although 也不用對齊嗎?


22.   Although films about the American West depict coyotes as solitary animals howling mournfully on the tops of distant hills, in reality these gregarious creatures live in stable groups that occupy the same territory for long periods.


(A) films about the American West depict coyotes as solitary animals howling mournfully on the tops of distant hills


(B) in films about the American West coyotes are depicted to be solitary animals that howl mournfully on the tops of distant hills


(C) coyotes are depicted as solitary animals howling mournfully on the tops of distant hills in films about the American West


(D) films about the American West depict coyotes as if they were solitary, mournfully howling animals on the tops of distant hillsA


(E) films about the American West depict coyotes to be solitary and mournfully howling animals on the tops of distant hills


盼各位大俠相救啊~~


作者: weichenli    时间: 2005-10-10 14:13

22題我理解了--although 又不是接代詞, 不需要跟後面的gregarious creatures 對秤!


從句跟主句可以分開來看, 而這又跟 unlike A, B... 比較兩個不同但同類的東西, 是不同的文法點


自己迷糊了! 但對於24題的平衡疑問仍未解呢..有沒有好心人啊? 先說聲謝謝呢!


作者: weichenli    时间: 2005-10-11 13:46
up up!
作者: weichenli    时间: 2005-10-11 13:51

我想是比较出来的原因吧!!


e 有明显的错误呢。。所以还是啊a来的好


作者: julia_ggw    时间: 2005-11-20 06:21
我也想问单复数不同的情况下,是不是就不存在逻辑指代的问题?
作者: 麦麦麦    时间: 2005-11-22 17:09

我以为IT不能先出现,第一次出现应该是名词形式,否则就不知道指代谁拉。。所以一上来就排掉了。。


由这题我知道我错了,但想请大家帮忙纠正一下,或者肯定一下如何思考是正确的。。。


谢谢~


作者: toeflboy2005    时间: 2006-5-3 05:28
标题: hi
wrong! it can appear at first. There are many cases in section
作者: xjlv128    时间: 2006-5-3 07:50
同意楼上。只要代词的指代对象在句中出现就行
作者: hawkinsxie    时间: 2006-5-9 16:23

这种指代不好,但当全文只有一个单数对象时,至少不会有歧义。


我们说指代问题,总是说指代不清,即指代对象可能有好几个。


至于时态:


during two decades; for two decades 要用现在完成时


within two decades; in two decades 一般现在时和现在完成时,甚至一般讲来时均可


作者: greenbow43    时间: 2006-6-4 04:12
以下是引用xjlv128在2006-5-3 7:50:00的发言:
同意楼上。只要代词的指代对象在句中出现就行

我彻底迷糊了

有没有NN权威证实一下阿,我好睡个好觉阿~~~~


作者: happylifelin    时间: 2006-6-24 23:28
以下是引用IceOnMe在2005-5-28 23:18:00的发言:

同问上一楼的问题

AB 的its 和主句的主语无关么?

Even though its per capita food supply has hardly increased in two decades, stringent rationing and planned distribution have allowed the People’s Republic of China to ensure nutritional levels of 2,000 calories per person per day for its population.

我把its指rationing and distrbution 作为指代逻辑错误, 以及主句谓语have ...复数形式作为排除AB的依据了 : (

NN help!!!


作者: llfllfllf    时间: 2006-6-25 00:10

很明显啊,楼上有人说过了, 后面未划线有its啊, 后面的its就是指the People’s Republic of China

不会有任何的逻辑主语不一致的说法


作者: cournot    时间: 2006-7-22 06:41

24.   Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during two decades, stringent rationing and planned distribution have allowed the People’s Republic of China to ensure nutritional levels of 2,000 calories per person per day for its population.

 (B) Even though its per capita food supply has hardly increased in

(C) Despite its per capita food supply hardly increasing over

c为什么错?


作者: cournot    时间: 2006-7-29 07:36


作者: xiaowan    时间: 2006-8-27 16:35

per capital (food supply)还是(per capital food) supply通常名词作定语都是会有歧义的哦~~ 


作者: wei_wangyan    时间: 2006-12-7 15:45
以下是引用hawkinsxie在2006-5-9 16:23:00的发言:

这种指代不好,但当全文只有一个单数对象时,至少不会有歧义。

我们说指代问题,总是说指代不清,即指代对象可能有好几个。

至于时态:

during two decades; for two decades 要用现在完成时

within two decades; in two decades 一般现在时和现在完成时,甚至一般讲来时均可

这一段是为说明什么? 这好像更证明E也对啊....

its的指代问题还没解决.....


作者: wei_wangyan    时间: 2006-12-7 15:49
以下是引用iselibra在2003-11-17 0:03:00的发言:
E:there be在gmat中很少用,往往表示自然存在;for two decades要用完城市

OG的解释: E fails to specify where there was no increase in per capita food supply.

不用there be, 是这个原因吗? 看不太懂.. there be句型中一定要有具体地点吗?


作者: tasteofbit    时间: 2007-3-13 16:47
想不明白,这题考的思路是什么?in,over,for,during时态的运用?
作者: gonghao    时间: 2007-3-13 16:57
it应该是指PRC了,由于逻辑主语是复数,it只能有唯一指代,不存在修饰问题
作者: hhdty    时间: 2007-4-1 16:36

谁可以把时态的问题明确一下

谢谢


作者: elizabeth_xu    时间: 2007-12-3 16:44

弱弱的问一句:

although,even though,despite 有什么区别啊?

有没有优先次序?


作者: 不是天真    时间: 2008-1-5 04:10

本题中单数只有prc,所以it指代没有问题,补充一下,during应该和一般过去时搭配,而不是完成时,,在og中无数例子

关于楼上的问题,although和even though是连词,despite是介词后面只能跟名词,,至于although和even though的优先次序

暂时还米有发现也


作者: 不是天真    时间: 2008-1-5 04:11

刚刚又看了一遍题,,发现后面还有 its population,所以it指代中国绝对没有问题


作者: skyshadow    时间: 2008-9-5 16:53
C为什么不行?因为despite是介词,后面不能跟its per capita food supply hardly increasing over...这样的状语结构么?
作者: smartsky11    时间: 2009-3-14 16:04
4
作者: xxxyyyzzz1    时间: 2009-4-13 12:27
顶下
有谁能解释下为什么要用完成时啊?
in xxx +时间 也要用完成时么?



作者: AlienX    时间: 2009-4-13 13:03
強調"從以前到現在"
主句的"have allowed"是一個hint

作者: xxxyyyzzz1    时间: 2009-4-13 13:17
那during为什么不可以呢?
因为在in 2 decades和during 2 decades中,这两个时间状语都不是典型的现在完成时时间状语啊......

作者: 天蝎座1107    时间: 2009-4-13 17:00

885-01-24. Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during two decades, stringent rationing and planned distribution have allowed the People’s Republic of China to ensure nutritional levels of 2,000 calories per person per day for its population.
(A) Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during
(B) Even though its per capita food supply has hardly increased in
(C) Despite its per capita food supply hardly increasing over
(D) Despite there being hardly any increase in its per capita food supply during
(E) Although there is hardly any increase in per capita food supply for

Longman上的during解释1
from the beginning to the end of a period of time
During the summer she worked as a lifeguard. He slept calmly during the early part of the night. Foxes remain hidden during the day.
2
at some point in a period of time
My father was killed during the war. I mentioned the subject during our discussions at her Washington office.

貌似用现在完成时与during无关吧?


作者: qingyuy    时间: 2009-8-13 02:17
以下是引用天蝎座1107在2009/4/13 17:00:00的发言:

885-01-24. Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during two decades, stringent rationing and planned distribution have allowed the People’s Republic of China to ensure nutritional levels of 2,000 calories per person per day for its population.
(A) Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during
(B) Even though its per capita food supply has hardly increased in
(C) Despite its per capita food supply hardly increasing over
(D) Despite there being hardly any increase in its per capita food supply during
(E) Although there is hardly any increase in per capita food supply for

Longman上的during解释1
from the beginning to the end of a period of time
During the summer she worked as a lifeguard. He slept calmly during the early part of the night. Foxes remain hidden during the day.
2
at some point in a period of time
My father was killed during the war. I mentioned the subject during our discussions at her Washington office.

貌似用现在完成时与during无关吧?

顶一下!

这题的时态问题很让人困惑啊,貌似during和in都不是明确的现在完成时的标志词,是不是要通过主句的时态判断啊?如果仅从分句来看,A好像也没错。。。


作者: mars_cheung    时间: 2009-12-10 00:25
during two decades 起码不是过去完成时的明显标志,而且主句里面的 have allowed 也是用现在时态的一个重要提示,同一个句子里尽量保持时态的一致。
B 选项用 has hardly increased in two decades 表示动作延续至今,逻辑上更符合

因此 B 选项的时态优于 A 选项的过去时。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3