ChaseDream

标题: 请高手看看这2题：885secE 11、15~ [打印本页]

作者: twelvecolors 时间: 2003-10-19 11:33
标题: 请高手看看这2题：885secE 11、15~
11. The man was always aware, sometimes proudly and sometimes resentfully, that he was a small-town Midwesterner who was thrust into a world that was dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than him.
(A) who was thrust into a world that was dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than him
(B) who had been thrust into a world that was dominated by more wealthy, educated, and polished people than him
(C) who had been thrust into a world dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and people more polished than he was
(D) thrust into a world dominated by more wealthy, educated, and polished people than him
(E) thrust into a world dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than he
答案是E,请问C为什么不对？

15. In good years, the patchwork of green fields that surround the San Joaquin Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of them in the area just for the season.
(A) surround the San Joaquin Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of them
(B) surrounds the San Joaquin Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of whom are
(C) surround the San Joaquin Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of who are
(D) surround the San Joaquin Valley town bustle with farm workers, many of which
(E) surrounds the San Joaquin Valley town bustles with farm workers, many are
答案是A,请问C错在哪里？谢谢！

作者: hedgeforfun 时间: 2003-10-19 22:01
1.c有歧义，变成he was donimated by,其实是people 和he比,而且people 的位置也有问题。
2.我也不知道,我和你選的一樣,有誰可以解答嗎?

作者: gemj 时间: 2003-10-19 22:10
应该是many of whom再看下面的例子：

(D) In the United States a significant proportion of the commercial honey supply comes from hobby beekeepers, many of whom are likely to abandon beekeeping with the influx of Africanized bees.

(D) Voters in the city, many of whom benefit from the low transit fares, are strongly opposed to increasing local taxes.

Saint-Simon’s followers, many of whom were women, based their feminism on an interpretation of his project to reorganize the globe by replacing brute force with the rule of spiritual powers.

(E) The composition of this elite included vice-chancellors, many of whom held office because of their wealth.

作者: mjiehu 时间: 2003-10-20 02:46
a. the proper structure should be "than he" or "than he was"
b/c. there is no indication of the past perfect tense here in this sentence, also in C, the adjectives "wealthier, better-educated, more polished" refer to a group of people, you could understand the usage by adding a "the" in front of each word
d. loss of comparative structure

作者: hedgeforfun 时间: 2003-11-7 12:33
还是有疑问,第一题的than之后,为什么不可以用him?不都是by的宾语吗?
第二题还是不明白,为什么不可以用many of whom,而且many of them这句话没有谓语了呀

作者: dandan74 时间: 2003-11-7 13:59
15：我认为many of whom 也可以，看surronds不行，所以排除B.
E中的many of them xxx是一个独立主格结构，不需要谓语
11：可以用than he, 但是than he was不行，因为这里是比较介词by的宾语，所以than后面不能出现主谓结构。

作者: allaneli 时间: 2003-11-7 14:00
第二题，b选项（many of whom）的谓语动词不对，a 选项many of them...是独立主格只是带姐词的一种

第一题我也不太清楚，请牛牛们在讲一讲

作者: may1129 时间: 2003-12-13 00:25
(C) who had been thrust into a world dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and people more polished than he was

1st, concise :
…man who had been thrust into = man trust into

2nd parallelism
…by wealthier, better-educated, and people more polished than he was..
= wealthier, better-educated, and people <-wrong
should be ‘wealthier, better-educated, and more polished”

作者: may1129 时间: 2003-12-13 00:33
the intended meaning : many workers come, among these workers, a large portion come just for the season.

“many of who are” limitedly modifies the “worker”, slightly distorting the meaning: only those workers who stay in just for the season come to the valley

my own opinion, not creditable

作者: Snazzy 时间: 2003-12-13 12:54
i am confused even more, how can u know 'which' modifies 'fields' instead of 'patchwork' since it refers to the first one in several other questions?

作者: Snazzy 时间: 2003-12-13 13:06
What the hell r they? if the answer for No15 were 'sound', this one would be 'fail', right?

6. One of every two new businesses fail within two years.
(A) fail
(B) fails
(C) should fail
(D) may have failed
(E) has failed

作者: shaya 时间: 2004-12-20 10:09

以下是引用hedgeforfun在2003-11-7 12:33:00的发言：
还是有疑问,第一题的than之后,为什么不可以用him?不都是by的宾语吗?

我也有和她同样的困惑，请nn解答！

作者: shaya 时间: 2004-12-20 10:22

我找到了。

作者: 小I爱漂漂 时间: 2005-1-28 11:44

以下是引用gemj在2003-10-19 22:10:00的发言：
应该是many of whom再看下面的例子：

(D) In the United States a significant proportion of the commercial honey supply comes from hobby beekeepers, many of whom are likely to abandon beekeeping with the influx of Africanized bees.

(D) Voters in the city, many of whom benefit from the low transit fares, are strongly opposed to increasing local taxes.

Saint-Simon’s followers, many of whom were women, based their feminism on an interpretation of his project to reorganize the globe by replacing brute force with the rule of spiritual powers.

(E) The composition of this elite included vice-chancellors, many of whom held office because of their wealth.

想确定一下，在这些句子中，是不是MANY OF WHOM都是做同位语的? 宾语同位语或者主语同位语.

作者: 小I爱漂漂 时间: 2005-1-28 11:51
15. In good years, the patchwork of green fields that surround the San Joaquin Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of them in the area just for the season.
(A) surround the San Joaquin Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of them
(B) surrounds the San Joaquin Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of whom are
(C) surround the San Joaquin Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of who are
(D) surround the San Joaquin Valley town bustle with farm workers, many of which
(E) surrounds the San Joaquin Valley town bustles with farm workers, many are
B如果改成(B) surround the San Joaquin Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of whom are就是对的, 是吗? 还有最后一个问题，答案A的MANY OF THEM感觉是不是少了一个连接词呀?? 多谢多谢!!!!

作者: eSpirit 时间: 2005-1-28 11:58

以下是引用小I爱漂漂在2005-1-28 11:51:00的发言：
B如果改成(B) surround the San Joaquin Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of whom are就是对的, 是吗? 还有最后一个问题，答案A的MANY OF THEM感觉是不是少了一个连接词呀?? 多谢多谢!!!!

surround the San Joaquin Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of whom are

我觉得这样的表达是可以的.只是没有用独立主格结构简洁.A中的many of them是一个独立主格结构,前面已有逗号隔开,可以不用连接词.

作者: 小I爱漂漂 时间: 2005-1-28 12:14
谢谢eSpirit, 我以为many of whom are 才是独立主格结构, many of them不是呢? 不对吗?

作者: eSpirit 时间: 2005-1-28 12:16
many of whom变成了一个修饰名词的定语从句了。其中的whom就是前面的“人”

作者: 小I爱漂漂 时间: 2005-1-28 17:20

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-28 17:20:59编辑过]

作者: 小I爱漂漂 时间: 2005-1-28 17:21

以下是引用eSpirit在2005-1-28 12:16:00的发言：
many of whom变成了一个修饰名词的定语从句了。其中的whom就是前面的“人”

????我怎么越看它越象同位语呢?

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-28 17:22:53编辑过]

作者: STEVEN_SH 时间: 2005-1-28 17:26

i am confused even more, how can u know 'which' modifies 'fields' instead of 'patchwork' since it refers to the first one in several other questions?——个人认为，句意上看，that修饰green fields，fields surround town，patchwork单独这个词具体意思不太肯定，the patchwork of green fields应该是一大块的田地的意思吧（或者是田间小路），都觉得patchwork surround town 不如 field surrond town合适

One of every two new businesses fail within two years.——中心词是one,用fails吧

many of them / many of whom are个人觉得都可以

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-28 17:52:02编辑过]

作者: joe11 时间: 2005-1-30 14:27

many of them just in the area for the season 象伴随壮语

如薄冰语法 (2000年4月)所讲，pp.472, 伴随情况壮语，常由短语和独立主格表示，多位于句末和句首。

many of whom are in the area for the reason 是非限制性同位语从句

pp.462.

作者: 小I爱漂漂 时间: 2005-1-30 16:56

谢谢版主GG....

作者: Laurencecoco 时间: 2005-8-8 14:27
我想patchwork是不能surround的呀，同时many of them 应该是独立主格吧，请大牛们指教

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-8 14:30:45编辑过]

作者: stevewu 时间: 2005-8-30 15:00

同意~

作者: bigtone 时间: 2005-10-24 04:29

明白了

作者: fannyyudan 时间: 2006-3-21 11:55

以下是引用joe11在2005-1-30 14:27:00的发言：

many of them just in the area for the season 象伴随壮语

如薄冰语法 (2000年4月)所讲，pp.472, 伴随情况壮语，常由短语和独立主格表示，多位于句末和句首。

many of whom are in the area for the reason 是非限制性同位语从句

pp.462.

完全同意，这个伴随壮语是不是可以理解成独立主格呢？

（一）：独立主格结构的构成：
名词(代词)+现在分词、过去分词；
名词(代词)+形容词；
名词(代词)+副词；
名词(代词)+不定式；
名词(代词) +介词短语构成。　

（二）独立主格结构的特点：
　　1）独立主格结构的逻辑主语与句子的主语不同，它独立存在。
　　2）名词或代词与后面的分词，形容词，副词，不定式，介词等是主谓关系。
　　3）独立主格结构一般有逗号与主句分开。

作者: hawkinsxie 时间: 2006-5-6 23:48

以下是引用fannyyudan在2006-3-21 11:55:00的发言：

完全同意，这个伴随壮语是不是可以理解成独立主格呢？

作者: lancome130 时间: 2006-6-7 17:44

many of whom是错的，因为这里指代的不是宾格。

作者: lb1900 时间: 2006-6-7 18:30

其实从后半句判断，只有A,B可能。fields 是复数才能sound，patchwork除非是一个连续的环，无法sound.　但如果是一连续的环，何来复数的fields? 而且现实中一个山谷不可能被一块连续的绿地包围。

有一问题：many of who 是否对？是否一定many of whom?

作者: cattsky 时间: 2006-8-31 00:52
有没有例如：“独立主格结构优于重句”的规律啊？

作者: huoduoduo 时间: 2006-11-22 15:51

再问，15题。

我怎么记得，who 可以代替whom　啊？

是我记错了吗？！

作者: 发粪涂墙 时间: 2007-1-15 02:57

以下是引用joe11在2005-1-30 14:27:00的发言：

many of them just in the area for the season 象伴随壮语

如薄冰语法 (2000年4月)所讲，pp.472, 伴随情况壮语，常由短语和独立主格表示，多位于句末和句首。

many of whom are in the area for the reason 是非限制性同位语从句

pp.462.

还是不知道答案为什么选A？

作者: xmlvivian 时间: 2011-4-3 20:47
我不明白第二题为什么不能是surrounds

作者: lesoleil29 时间: 2014-12-23 16:18
肯定不能用who, 前面的farm workers是处于介词短语中间“with farm workers”, 后面要指代肯定是要用宾格的，就这一点来看只有A和B正确。这一点的解释参看OG13-SC中的43题，就是关于Laos和Great Britain的对比问题。让人纠结的是43题中OG给的答案是many of whom are...

作者: lesoleil29 时间: 2014-12-23 16:23
关于surrounds还是surround,我的理解是这样的，从语义上来讲，patchwork是green fields形成的，patchwork是一个集合性的名词，不太适合surround,具体的surround 这个动作是形成它的fields完成的，因此后面的限定性定语从句修饰fields更合逻辑。还要注意，后面还有一个动词bustle,而这个动词的主语是patchwork更为合适，因此正确选项中bustle用了单数bustles. 个人意见，仅供参考。

作者: lesoleil29 时间: 2014-12-23 16:26
没有人注意到这个贴子歪楼了吗

我本来要看的是one of every two new businesses fail within two years这道题的解释啊。。。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)