A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer’s well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the lawsuit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers’ services cost more than those of their imitators.
The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer’s rendition of a song from a good imitator’s rendition of the same song.
(B) Commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singers.
(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.
(D) Advertising firms will continue to use imitators to mimic the physical mannerisms of famous singers.（E）
(E) The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials.
为什么是E，不是B？
前提：名人告侵权，赢了； 遂公司不得在广告中再使用模仿者来唱名人的歌
结论：公司的广告花费要增加了，因为名人要的钱多
gap- 公司得用名人做广告啊。如果公司不用名人作广告的话，那花费怎么会上升？
B完全是无关，题目讨论的是costs， B说的是effectiveness
明白了
多谢
是用名人的名歌来做广告吧，如果不用名歌来做广告，那么名人的广告费也不会大大超过模仿者的广告费
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |