ChaseDream

标题: [求助]TTGWD21-13 [打印本页]

作者: smilingday108 时间: 2006-10-11 09:52
标题: [求助]TTGWD21-13

Q13:

When drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950’s, some 4,000 existed in the United States, but today there are less than one-quarter that many.

there are less than one-quarter that many
there are fewer than one-quarter as many
there are fewer than one-quarter of that amount
the number is less than one-quarter the amount
it is less than one-quarter of that amount

答案是B。我选了D。我想来想去，D是不是错在the number应该用high or low 来修饰，而不应用less or more

但是我觉得B中，对比的"but"前后不太对称，不太符合ETS的规则。

but 前是 some 4,000 existed in .......

对比的是but后，there are.....

请教一下大家，为什么B不对？

谢谢。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-12 1:59:54编辑过]

作者: yogaII 时间: 2006-10-11 10:04
D 中的less than是错的.

我认为B是正确的.

作者: smilingday108 时间: 2006-10-12 02:01
为什么错呀，我还是不很明白。

作者: avalanche 时间: 2006-11-27 16:28

我选C。one quarter of sth.

相比double the number / double the amount 有所不同哦

作者: seaskyang 时间: 2006-11-27 20:28
如果答案是b 的话，请问 as many 做什么成份？谢谢！

作者: shanexwang 时间: 2006-11-28 06:24
i chose Cａｓ　ｗｅｌｌ
以前有讨论吗？

作者: raikey 时间: 2007-6-2 03:15

我来纠正一下答案,应该是A.

在网上查了很多资料后,被彻底说服.

该题考点:

many和amount可以作代词,前者用于可数名词,后者用于不可数名词

遇到百分比或分数时,即使是修饰可数名词,也用less,如There are less than 50% students still in the classroom.

A正确,"分数"前用less,并且many指代drive-ins.

B错在"as"的用法,并且"分数"前用了fewer.

C错在"分数"前用了fewer,并且句子不完整.因为这里amount只能指代"4000",简化后原句变为"there are fewer than 1000."后面缺了点东东啊!

D错在"the"上,应改为that

E错在"it"指代不明.

作者: nickynicky 时间: 2007-8-4 12:58

A是official answer吗？

谁能帮忙确认一下？

作者: nickynicky 时间: 2007-8-4 13:28
我在网上查到了很多ｆｅｗｅｒ修饰分数的

作者: lichabrend 时间: 2008-6-27 18:39
up

作者: minititan 时间: 2009-6-29 11:27
up

作者: ohmygod7627 时间: 2009-7-25 22:24
謝謝大家~

作者: 番茄蛋花汤 时间: 2010-7-8 15:53
DING~~

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)