ChaseDream

标题: [求助]关于gwd12-34新疑问,已经看过讨论贴 [打印本页]

作者: 想桐桐的蝎子    时间: 2006-10-9 20:43
标题: [求助]关于gwd12-34新疑问,已经看过讨论贴
gwd12-34
    

Q34:

In an attempt to guarantee the security of its innovative water purification method, the company required each employee to sign a confidentiality agreement prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies using an analogous purification process.

  1. prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies
                
  2. prohibiting them from the disclosing of its water purification methods to any company
                
  3. prohibiting disclosure of its water purification methods to any company
                
  4. that would prohibit them from disclosure of its water purification methods to companies
                
  5. that would prohibit its water purification methods to be disclosed to a company
已经看过讨论贴,虽然赞同C,但是还是有一点新疑问,想问问为什么C中的its不会引起歧义,首先语法上应该优先指代a confidentiality agreement ,但是逻辑上又应该指代the company ,那不就有歧义了吗?很不理解,望各位大侠热心指导,感激不尽
作者: yogaII    时间: 2006-10-9 20:50
someone's water purification methods -> 第一句中的 its innovative water purification method. 另外 a confidentiality agreement's methods 说不通, 所以没有逻辑歧义。
作者: 想桐桐的蝎子    时间: 2006-10-9 22:42

经过提示我想主要原因是同个句子当中所有相同代词只能指代同一主语对吗?我终于明白了,谢谢


作者: wisdomcorn    时间: 2008-9-28 06:29

why E is false?


作者: 路吉儿    时间: 2009-8-4 20:28

作者: carriexu    时间: 2009-8-22 15:36
我查到的prohibit的用法是prohibit sth 和sb is prohibit from doing不能说sb is prohibit to do,没有prohibit that 这种形式,看这个好像只能选C




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3