ChaseDream

标题: GWD-12-Q13顺便问一下and和or [打印本页]

作者: luwjun    时间: 2006-10-7 21:11
标题: GWD-12-Q13顺便问一下and和or

Although energy prices have tripled in the United States over the last two years, research indicates few people to have significantly reduced the amount of driving they do, nor are they making fuel efficiency a priority when shopping for cars.

 

  1. few people to have significantly reduced the amount of driving they do, nor are they making

  2. few people having significantly reduced the amount of driving they do or made

  3. that there are few people who have significantly reduced the amount of driving they do, nor having made

  4. that few people have significantly reduced the amount of driving they do and are not making

  5. that few people have significantly reduced the amount of driving they do or made

我记得石林说有not和no才是否定句,并列用or

否则就是肯定句。用and

他还举了一个例子:I have never been to XX, YY and ZZ.

为什么这里用or?


作者: pumpkin    时间: 2006-10-8 12:19
不问为啥对,只要找为什么错就可以
作者: luwjun    时间: 2006-10-8 16:23
en,看来只有这么看了,但是and和or的区别究竟是什么?
作者: stellachan    时间: 2009-6-8 11:58
为什么不选D?
作者: VivienZheng    时间: 2009-8-1 17:33

作者: 马晓娟    时间: 2009-8-2 11:11

and 要连接两个并列成分的吧,前面句子用的不定式,and 后面的动词也应该用不定式的,不能用分词


作者: tigerkin2008    时间: 2009-8-25 10:50

这里要用or,表两种可选择的情况,不是说很少人既减少开车,又在买车的时候考虑节油性能。用and就表示两种事情同时做。






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3