ChaseDream

标题: 大全补充182,未讨论! [打印本页]

作者: captain_ma    时间: 2006-10-6 23:13
标题: 大全补充182,未讨论!

182.
                
She was a child prodigy, and Clara Schumann developed into one of the greatest pianists of her time.

(A) She was a child prodigy, and Clara Schumann

(B) A child prodigy, Clara Schumann

(C) Child prodigy that she was, Clara Schumann

(D) Clara Schumann has been a child prodigy, and sheB

(E) Being a child prodigy, Clara Schumann

请问e这个结构为什么不可以?分词的逻辑主语就是主语。嗯,印象中好像有being+名词一定错这一说,是这样的吗?


作者: 誓不低头的重生    时间: 2006-10-6 23:55
这种结构一般来说不作为正确选项




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3