AI138
“Although restricting public access can help protect national parks and historical sites, in fact there should be few, if any, such restrictions because these places were intended for everyone to use.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
138. 一些人宣称为了保护国家公园和历史遗迹，参观它们的公众应该被严格限制。另外一些争论说因为这些地方是设计为所有人使用的，所以应该只有很少，甚至没有限制。
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In our daily life, we come across many things that need us to make a judgment or comment. Some people think that it is helpful to protect national parks and historical sites by restricting public access, meanwhile others hold the opinions that it should be free for everyone to use these public sites. As far as I am concerned, it should not be restrictions to people who intend to visit the national parks and the historical sites. In the following discussion, I would like to present evidence to support my point of view.
The chief reason for my view is that people can use the national parks and historical sites to produce much more value if they use the parks and sites as resources rationally. This, the first reason can be seen by every person. National parks can afford information and historical sites can also make people feel the ancient time. For example, you want to do a research about the ancient people in
To take the idea further, it is good for people to understand the culture and the history in your country. You do not have to look far to find the reason two. In this global information age, getting to know the culture of your country will definitely enhance your capability of absorbing the other knowledge as well. The national parks and historical sites are parts of the culture of the civilization, which is existed in the competing environment. The competitions between ourselves, person against person, communities against communities, country against country, still persist, however, and it as fierce as it ever was. Undoubtedly, getting to know the culture of your country is a pragmatic method to improve your competing ability.
Admittedly, restrictions to the national parks and historical sites are important under certain circumstances. Protecting the valuable places is somewhat necessary as well. There may be one or two disadvantages to remove the restrictions, but the advantages of free to visit the national parks and historical sites are overweight the advantages.
Again, I would demonstrate my opinion on this issue after the analysis. It should be free to visit the national parks and the historical sites. Certainly the deduction of it is not limited to the above discussion, and we may also reach such a conclusion from the economic factor. The tickets can contribute the income of the local government. When you consider all this, how could you not accept this conclusion?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |