50. That educators have not anticipated the impact
of microcomputer technology can hardly be
said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in
Future Shock, published in 1970.
(A) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault
(B) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault
(C) It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology
(D) It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology
(E) The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said
我不太懂为什么a错了,og的解释是the main verb is both preceded and followed by a subordinate clause,可是这样不行吗?
有点晕~~~~~~
That educators that have not anticipated the impact
of microcomputer technology can hardly be
said that it is their fault:
that不能省
I think it's wordy and redundant
我不是很理解C为什么不对,看句意表达得也非常清楚。怎样能排除它呢?
谢谢~~
我也有些晕,确实是头重脚轻,
但是 OG的解释我没有太懂“In original sentence,the subordinate clause that ... techniue is followed by the main verb, can...be said, but then the verb is followed by yet another subordinate clasue, that it is their fault." 是说这个只是不是习惯表达,还是具体有错误,错在哪里呢?
我认为,C和D的意思不同,D和原文表达的意思相同
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |