ChaseDream

标题: TTGWD-1-V1, 没搜到。给帮忙看看？ [打印本页]

作者: fusiyu 时间: 2006-9-17 08:06
标题: TTGWD-1-V1, 没搜到。给帮忙看看？

Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.

is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were
is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was
is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were
are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was
are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were

Answer: C 这个“be” 是啥结构啊？

作者: 娜na 时间: 2006-9-17 11:30

这题之前讨论过是个虚拟

作者: iceage_spring 时间: 2006-9-17 12:50
"shall" in front of "be" can be omitted, I think.That is: "agreement (shall) be signed by them..."

作者: fg_bamboo 时间: 2007-11-21 06:33

这题应该是A吧

作者: lissy_721 时间: 2007-11-21 22:58
A的that修饰了signed错，应该修饰agreement

作者: Icanw 时间: 2007-11-22 01:19

答案是 A.

that 修饰就近的名词，不可能修饰一个被动词，所以修饰agreement没有歧义。

C 中， be 用得没有根据，而且assigned by them 中的them 指代 the potential investors ，语法上很牵强。

作者: vivian_chi 时间: 2007-11-22 17:57

虚拟结构亲爱的同志们，if were,C+(should/would...)be 表示对过去的猜测。

A的错误太明显了，放在动词后面的that怎么可能修饰前面的名词呢，何况until引导的是从句。

作者: lissy_721 时间: 2007-11-22 23:02

以下是引用vivian_chi在2007-11-22 17:57:00的发言：

虚拟结构亲爱的同志们，if were,C+(should/would...)be 表示对过去的猜测。

A的错误太明显了，放在动词后面的that怎么可能修饰前面的名词呢，何况until引导的是从句。

正解

现在看见if were直接想虚拟了都

作者: yuching730 时间: 2007-11-26 04:15

Correct ans is A!!!!!!!

I agree with Icanw MM

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)