ChaseDream

标题: GWD31-Q10 搜过没有 [打印本页]

作者: allen0018    时间: 2006-9-13 21:50
标题: GWD31-Q10 搜过没有

    

The Hyksos invaded the Nile Delta, of Egypt and ruled it from 1650 B.C.


    

Their origin is uncertain, but archaeologists hypothesize that they
were Canaanites.


    

In support of this hypothesis, the archaeologists point out that
excavations of Avans,


    

The Hyksos capital in Egypt, have
uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually


    

Identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, and Ashkelon
was a majkor city of


    

Canaan at the
time of the Hyksos’ invasion.


    

 


    

In order to evaluate the force of the
archaeologists. Evidence ,it would


    

Useful to determine which of the following ?


    

 


    

1)     
whether artifacts from Ashkelon
were widely traded to non-Canaanite cities


    

2)     
Whether significant numbers of
artifacts that do not resemble artifacts


    

produced in Ashkelon
have been found at Avaris


    

3)     
Whether Avaris was the nearest
Hyksos city in Egypt to Canaan


    

4)     
Whether Ashkelon
after 1550 B.C.continued to produce artifacts similar to whose


    

found at Avaris


    

5)     
whether any artifacts produced
by the Hyksos after 1550 B.C .have been


    

found in Egypt
        



[此贴子已经被作者于2006-9-14 14:05:02编辑过]

作者: wycg    时间: 2006-9-14 10:58
看不太清楚,lz重贴一下.
作者: AlienX    时间: 2008-3-6 02:04
我也不太會.
我選B.
我覺得A跟B都可以.
我不明白為什麼B不對.
有人可以解釋一下嗎???

作者: jesuischong    时间: 2008-10-14 03:28

我也觉得A可以呀.....

The Hyksos invaded the Nile Delta of Egypt and ruled it from 1650 B.C. Their origin is uncertain, but archaeologists hypothesize that they were Canaanites. In support of this hypothesis, the archaeologists point out that excavations of Avans, the Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, and Ashkelon was a major city of Canaan at the time of the Hyksos’ invasion.

In order to evaluate the force of the archaeologists’ evidence, it would useful to determine which of the following?

A.          Whether artifacts from Ashkelon were widely traded to non-Canaanite cities?

B.           Whether significant numbers of artifacts that do not resemble artifacts produced in Ashkelon have been found at Avans?

C.          Whether Avans was the nearest Hyksos city in Egypt to Canaan?

D.          Whether Ashkelon after 1550 B.C. continued to produce artifacts similar to those found at Avans?

E.           Whether any artifacts produced by the Hyksos after 1550 B.C .have been found in Egypt


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-10-14 3:29:14编辑过]

作者: pony1208    时间: 2009-6-27 14:01

同意A : Whether artifacts from Ashkelon were widely traded to non-Canaanite cities?

如果artifacts from Ashkelon
        
没有traded出去,则表示artifacts就是invasion那段时间带过去Egypt的。则可以确定The Hyksosorigin就是Ashkelon

如果artifacts from Ashkelon
        
widely traded,则表示artifacts可能是traded过去Egypt。则无法确定The Hyksosorigin


作者: Princika    时间: 2009-7-11 10:56

B无关 如果在Avans发现 有可能C占领了Ashkelon 和Acans这两个城市

      如果在Avans没发现 可能C占领了 Ashkelon 

不能回答题目


作者: hyl_0212    时间: 2010-9-8 15:52
up!!
我还是觉得AB都对
有没有人再来解释一下为什么B不对?还是不理解
作者: shayla_wu    时间: 2010-10-2 20:06
B选项无关
本文只讨论与avan所生产的一样的artifacts
what's at issue is artifacts identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon
作者: jesmine    时间: 2010-10-10 21:37
为什么D不可以吖?
要是在埃及发现了artifacts produced by the Hyksos after 1550 B.C,那不就说明The Hyksos invaded the Nile Delta of Egypt 了吗???
请求大家帮我指点下好不???
作者: shayla_wu    时间: 2010-10-10 21:51
D.    Whether Ashkelon after 1550 B.C. continued to produce artifacts similar to those found at Avans?

对该问题的回答是yes:对原文结论无影响;
如果回答是no:1550bc后不再生产那种器物,也有可能是hy将1550之前生产的器物带入了avans,原文结论依然成立
作者: jesmine    时间: 2010-10-12 19:33
D.    Whether Ashkelon after 1550 B.C. continued to produce artifacts similar to those found at Avans?

对该问题的回答是yes:对原文结论无影响;
如果回答是no:1550bc后不再生产那种器物,也有可能是hy将1550之前生产的器物带入了avans,原文结论依然成立
-- by 会员 shayla_wu (2010/10/10 21:51:44)

哦哦 !!!原来是这样啊~~~谢谢楼上的MM!!!!
作者: liuyang5249    时间: 2010-12-3 11:48
答案要找带canaanites的,注意文章的假设是,H的origin是否是C,所以答案要在AC中选择,C属于无关
作者: fangsigaoa    时间: 2011-4-12 11:33
还是不太理解B为什么不对啊。。。。
作者: Kb24    时间: 2011-4-12 14:40
支持A。
B的话不管是否成立,都不能有效削弱,如果B是YES, 是有很多其他的ARTIFACTS也被发现, 那也可以理解为是CANNITES占领埃及之前就有的,因此不能削弱该hypothesis
作者: fishgirl66    时间: 2011-5-27 12:07
B的意思是 是不是有大量的工艺品不像那些工艺品(在Ashkelon造的,已经在Avans发现的),题目没有探讨不像Avans的那些工艺品,题目have uncovered large numbers of artifactsvirtually identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon,只探讨像的那些工艺品,所以 无关;像也罢不像也罢,对H的起源不影响
作者: Ashley0814    时间: 2015-11-17 22:07
我选的D,做题的时候就觉得H去了占领了埃及就举国搬迁,不再在C了。。。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3