ChaseDream

标题: 难道THAN后面不是应该尽量补出V吗？ [打印本页]

作者: qiqi_cola 时间: 2003-10-13 20:33
标题: 难道THAN后面不是应该尽量补出V吗？
885 03/24

24. In his eagerness to find a city worthy of Priam, the German archaeologist Schliemann cut through Troy and uncovered a civilization a thousand years older as was the city Homer’s heroes knew.
(A) older as was the city Homer’s heroes knew
(B) more ancient than the city known to Homer’s heroes
(C) older than was the city known to Homer’s heroes
(D) more ancient of a city than Homer’s heroes knew
(E) older of a city than was the one known to Homer’s heroes
为什么是B而不是C？

作者: liflyy 时间: 2003-10-13 21:57
此题是不是考older和ancient的区别，另外里面有一个典故，HOMER应指荷马，所以时态应是had been known

作者: qiqi_cola 时间: 2003-10-13 22:10
谢谢楼上的。

作者: yanjuji 时间: 2003-10-13 23:50
答案是B,但解释不对

作者: nina23 时间: 2003-10-14 02:27

以下是引用yanjuji在2003-10-13 23:50:00的发言：
答案是B,但解释不对

can you explain it to me? I think the explain of the XDF is right.I am weak in this kind fo question.

作者: sbbi 时间: 2003-10-14 02:51
1.ancient>old

2.如果是:
uncovered a civilization that is a thousand years more acient than .. 可将is补出

3.我觉得不管怎样,was时态不对,应是is

作者: dc 时间: 2003-10-14 10:33

以下是引用sbbi在2003-10-14 2:51:00的发言：

3.我觉得不管怎样,was时态不对,应是is

To match the tense of "uncovered", shouldn't it be "was" ?
The civilization was a thousand years more ancient than the city was.

So maybe the only key is that ancient is better than old for "civilization" ?

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-10-14 10:37:29编辑过]

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)