ChaseDream

标题: 白勇2-31 [打印本页]

作者: yalemba2007 时间: 2006-9-8 11:58
标题: 白勇2-31
第二章31题说both the power and the devices平行结构概念不对. power是抽象名词 devices是具体名词.所以用both and 连接不对.这个规则是绝对正确的吗? 下载的书是PDF,没法把原题发过来, 只能这么说一下. 感谢大牛给指点一下.

作者: 清清小蚂蚁 时间: 2006-9-8 12:19
哈哈，这道题我昨天才看过，也正想问呢？？顶一下。

作者: 清清小蚂蚁 时间: 2006-9-8 12:19
好像书上说的是概念上要平行，可以ETS考的比较细吧。

作者: 行缘 时间: 2006-9-8 14:22

我觉得更多的应该从逻辑意思上理解，而不是从词性理解。这里明显的逻辑意思是指power是both chips and devices.供参考。

顺便帮你贴下题目：

7.As the etched lines on computer memory chips have become thinner and the chips' circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have vastly increased.
(A) the chips' circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have
(B) the chips' circuits more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive has
(C) the chips' circuits are more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive has
(D) their circuits are more complex, the power of both the chips and the electronic devices they drive have
(E) their circuits more complex, both the power of the chips and the electronic devices they drive have

作者: yalemba2007 时间: 2006-9-9 09:14

赞成行缘说的从逻辑意思上考虑.所以觉得BY说的太绝对了. 那么是不是说那个both and不能当作一个公理来推广? 有没有哪位给明确一下. 我是不是有点认死理啊? 不过我一向认为题不在多在精. 你想, 如果那个可以作为公理的话, 今后做题时可以扫倒一大片呢. 所以还是想搞清楚. 期盼中.....

作者: 清清小蚂蚁 时间: 2006-9-9 09:23

我觉得不能当公理，但是在主谓一致，平行，时态等大的绝对性错误之后可以考虑这个吧，

帮你顶一下。一起等解答。

作者: yalemba2007 时间: 2006-9-9 21:30

谢谢小蚂蚁MM的答复, 我们一起等吧. 不过我可等不久的, 快考了.

一北美高龄在职

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)