ChaseDream

标题: feifei-101答案是什么? [打印本页]

作者: rainbow1983 时间: 2006-9-8 11:52
标题: feifei-101答案是什么?

Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence, Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.

Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not a responsible psychologist, Dr. Ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

101. Anson bases his conclusion about Dr. Ladlow on which one of the following?

A. an attack on Dr. Ladlow’s character

B. the application of a general principle

C. the use of an ambiguous term

D. the discrediting of facts

E. the rejectiion of a theoretical explanation

好象没告诉答案吧......询问答案??

作者: gonghao 时间: 2006-9-8 16:28

i will choose B

A no attact the specific character any more

C no term is used

D no suspicicous the facts

E no reject the explanation

作者: zyzcdcdcd 时间: 2006-9-28 23:30
B

作者: znlhy 时间: 2007-1-31 21:08

到底答案是什么啊，为什么我的feifei135显示的答案是E呢？不过我也觉得选B。

作者: LOUI1121 时间: 2007-2-3 18:37

我选A.她说DR.是个IRRESPONSIBLE PHYCOLIGIST.

B为什么正确?

作者: liweich 时间: 2007-2-27 10:06
我也想知道為什麼B是正確的....

作者: wandola 时间: 2007-12-23 13:19

仔细想了想，应该不是attach personal character

而是运用generalization 给出这样一个conclusion: not responsible.

attack这个含有攻击的意思。

作者: shuishui_xp 时间: 2008-8-10 15:52

new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

说明前面那个人的理论没有最终被证实。

应该是 the application of a general principle.

作者: MBA1982 时间: 2008-9-15 11:06

但是这个general principle 是什么呢？？

是不是：Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect。

好像是？！

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-15 11:07:22编辑过]

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)