ChaseDream

标题: GWD26-Q24 确定下答案 [打印本页]

作者: allen0018 时间: 2006-9-6 17:41
标题: GWD26-Q24 确定下答案

24. GWD26-Q24

According to United States
census data, while there was about one-third

of mothers with
young children working outside the home in 1975, in 2000,

almost
two-thirds of those mothers were employed outside the home.

A. while there was about one-third of mothers
with young children

working outside the home in 1975, in 2000, almost
two-thirds

of those mothers were employed outside the home.

B. there were about one-third of mothers with
young children who

worked outside the home in 1975; in 2000, almost
two-thirds

of those mothers were employed outside the home

C. in 1975 about one-third of mothers with
young children worked

outside the home; in 2000, almost two-thirds of such
mothers

were employed outside the home

D. even though in 1975 there were about
one-third of mothers with

young children who worked outside the home, almost
two-thirds

of such mothers were employed outside the home in 2000

E. with about one-third of mothers with young
children working out-

side the home in 1975, almost two-thirds of such
mothers were

employed outside the home in 2000

D OR C AND WHY???

作者: Winbolin 时间: 2006-9-6 20:47

我覺得答案應是C

1. D.用even though感覺句意沒並要表達雖然..即使(相反)之意; 此原句意表達應是並列對比之意

2. D還犯了嚴重的who錯誤修飾: young children who worked ....

3. C. in 1975 ..S+V...; in 2000,..S+V...兩句架構平衡

4. D. there are....這種表達ets不喜歡 too awkward

作者: 幽幽sally 时间: 2006-11-17 23:12

24. GWD26-Q24

According to United States census data, while there was about one-third

of mothers with young children working outside the home in 1975, in 2000,

almost two-thirds of those mothers were employed outside the home.

A. while there was about one-third of mothers with young children

working outside the home in 1975, in 2000, almost two-thirds

of those mothers were employed outside the home.

B. there were about one-third of mothers with young children who

worked outside the home in 1975; in 2000, almost two-thirds

of those mothers were employed outside the home

C. in 1975 about one-third of mothers with young children worked

outside the home; in 2000, almost two-thirds of such mothers

were employed outside the home

D. even though in 1975 there were about one-third of mothers with

young children who worked outside the home, almost two-thirds

of such mothers were employed outside the home in 2000

E. with about one-third of mothers with young children working out-

side the home in 1975, almost two-thirds of such mothers were

employed outside the home in 2000

没有有人注意,those mothers 和 such mothers ?

作者: cccccc0 时间: 2007-1-5 17:11

以下是引用Winbolin在2006-9-6 20:47:00的发言：

我覺得答案應是C

1. D.用even though感覺句意沒並要表達雖然..即使(相反)之意; 此原句意表達應是並列對比之意

2. D還犯了嚴重的who錯誤修飾: young children who worked ....

3. C. in 1975 ..S+V...; in 2000,..S+V...兩句架構平衡

4. D. there are....這種表達ets不喜歡 too awkward

great~~~

作者: cccccc0 时间: 2007-1-5 17:15

以下是引用幽幽sally在2006-11-17 23:12:00的发言：

24. GWD26-Q24

According to United States census data, while there was about one-third

of mothers with young children working outside the home in 1975, in 2000,

almost two-thirds of those mothers were employed outside the home.

A. while there was about one-third of mothers with young children

working outside the home in 1975, in 2000, almost two-thirds

of those mothers were employed outside the home.

B. there were about one-third of mothers with young children who

worked outside the home in 1975; in 2000, almost two-thirds

of those mothers were employed outside the home

C. in 1975 about one-third of mothers with young children worked

outside the home; in 2000, almost two-thirds of such mothers

were employed outside the home

D. even though in 1975 there were about one-third of mothers with

young children who worked outside the home, almost two-thirds

of such mothers were employed outside the home in 2000

E. with about one-third of mothers with young children working out-

side the home in 1975, almost two-thirds of such mothers were

employed outside the home in 2000

没有有人注意,those mothers 和 such mothers ?

这题和那个什么chilren在1981年和1997年画时间做功课的SC题目的A选项的they指代错误差不多的，这里的those mothers错误的指代了75年的mother,此mother非彼mother!~

作者: sch 时间: 2007-12-15 09:50
以下是引用Winbolin在2006-9-6 20:47:00的发言：

我覺得答案應是C

1. D.用even though感覺句意沒並要表達雖然..即使(相反)之意; 此原句意表達應是並列對比之意

2. D還犯了嚴重的who錯誤修飾: young children who worked ....

3. C. in 1975 ..S+V...; in 2000,..S+V...兩句架構平衡

4. D. there are....這種表達ets不喜歡 too awkward

**************************

恩,但是第三条不同意. 毕竟跳跃修饰是可以的.否则我们看C:
in 1975 about one-third of mothers with young children worked

outside the home,这里worked作为分词也是跳跃修饰mother的.

所以这个who的修饰不能作为决断依据.

作者: rpch2004 时间: 2008-7-21 22:34

以下是引用sch在2007-12-15 9:50:00的发言：
以下是引用Winbolin在2006-9-6 20:47:00的发言：

我覺得答案應是C

1. D.用even though感覺句意沒並要表達雖然..即使(相反)之意; 此原句意表達應是並列對比之意

2. D還犯了嚴重的who錯誤修飾: young children who worked ....

3. C. in 1975 ..S+V...; in 2000,..S+V...兩句架構平衡

4. D. there are....這種表達ets不喜歡 too awkward

**************************

恩,但是第三条不同意. 毕竟跳跃修饰是可以的.否则我们看C:
in 1975 about one-third of mothers with young children worked

**************************

恩,但是第三条不同意. 毕竟跳跃修饰是可以的.否则我们看C:
in 1975 about one-third of mothers with young children worked

outside the home,这里worked作为分词也是跳跃修饰mother的.

所以这个who的修饰不能作为决断依据.

这里worked不是作为分词，而是动词，否则就没有谓语了

作者: yinlixiao 时间: 2008-9-12 04:22
这题还是有很多疑问：
1原句用了while,而且是一个句子，表达了比较的意思，D的even though不能算错，C改变了句子意思，一个句子变成两个，关系大大削弱。
为什么需要这样做？
2 C中的谓语动词worked一定是在修饰主语mothers,这个没有问题。
D中的who从句是不是有修饰children的嫌疑？
who从句是非限制性修饰，是不是该改为that, 那个with短语能够看作是隔开了从句和修饰对象吗？
谢谢！

作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2008-9-12 06:20

1、同意楼上的观点，不过while应该是表达让步，而不是比较，我认为while表示比较的时候比较双方应该是同时发生...而且如果是比较就不能被让步的even though所代替。

2、D中的who指代children有待商棰。定语从句完全可以跳跃指代。

3、但是我无法同意C里面用分号隔开两个有关联的句子。

4、such是指同类事物，those +n. 指代前面提到的Mothers，所以such mother是对的

5、C里面用worked把原句中用there be这个表达统计数据、存在的概念给抹掉了。统计数据用there be很正常，不能以那条规则排除选项。

同意D...

作者: nemo11 时间: 2008-9-12 07:05

while有2个用法，引导时间状语从句表示“当...的时候”，也可以引导句子作比较。

D who如果说可以跳跃指代，那么句子就指代不清了。

还是觉得C对

作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2008-9-12 07:51

定语从句跳过介词短语指代介词短语前面的成分是可以的.

while表转折比较不放在句首，表示"当...时"倒是可以，但是不符合逻辑意思.前后有不同时间的标志词，所以不能用"当...时"的意思

作者: nemo11 时间: 2008-9-12 11:40

138. (32216-!-item-!-188;#058&006031)

According to scientists at the University of Alaska, while the surface temperature of the globe has risen over the last century by about one degree Fahrenheit, the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees.

(A) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased in the previous thirty years by about five degrees

(B) the surface temperature in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada has increased over the last thirty years by about five degrees

(D) it had increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada by about five degrees over the previous thirty years

(E) it has increased in Alaska, Siberia, and northwestern Canada over the previous thirty years by about five degrees

这道题while在句首就是表比较的阿

另外who到底是就近修饰还是跳跃修饰从单复数根本无法判断，如果说跳跃修饰逻辑意思上成立，但是语法上却可以就近修饰，这就是矛盾所在啊

作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2008-9-12 12:47

umm...这不是比较吧，应该说是让步(你用让步的意思试试看，逻辑上是能够讲通的)。while表比较的时候是要同时发生的，前后并不同时...这一点就可以看出来如果while表示比较在本题里是矛盾的。ps:上面这个语法点我也不知道哪里总结来了的，不过暂且作为我的一个判断标准。如果有不同意见,pray point out.

作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2008-9-12 12:49

逻辑意思上成立，但是语法上却可以就近修饰

语法上也可以跳跃介词短语修饰啊...我认为介短前面的名词与介短的最后一个名词被修饰的优先级是相等的，关键要看逻辑意思了

作者: tiffany1102 时间: 2009-4-18 22:04

作者: raphael1234 时间: 2009-7-11 10:52
up

作者: raphael1234 时间: 2009-7-11 10:57

以下是引用aeoluseros在2008-9-12 12:49:00的发言：

逻辑意思上成立，但是语法上却可以就近修饰

语法上也可以跳跃介词短语修饰啊...我认为介短前面的名词与介短的最后一个名词被修饰的优先级是相等的，关键要看逻辑意思了

就是说,who可以跳跃修饰,关键看逻辑意思咯?

作者: daisyao 时间: 2009-7-20 15:17

以下是引用aeoluseros在2008/9/12 6:20:00的发言：

2、D中的who指代children有待商棰。定语从句完全可以跳跃指代。

3、但是我无法同意C里面用分号隔开两个有关联的句子。

4、such是指同类事物，those +n. 指代前面提到的Mothers，所以such mother是对的

5、C里面用worked把原句中用there be这个表达统计数据、存在的概念给抹掉了。统计数据用there be很正常，不能以那条规则排除选项。

同意D...

不过有一个问题，如果D中的who worked是跳跃指代的话，整句话是不是就没有谓语了？

one-third of mothers with young children
who worked outside the home,

作者: 斯咏 时间: 2009-7-31 13:24
.

作者: mars_cheung 时间: 2009-10-25 18:43

回 18 楼，worked 成了定从的话，even though 的谓语就是 there were，句子结构上是没问题的

不过我觉得这里是根据数据对现象的陈述，两个分句并列列出就可以了，没有让步的意思。

而且即使 D 的 who worked outside the home 可以跳跃修饰 mothers，还是存在就近修饰 children 的歧义

因此我还是选 C

作者: true 时间: 2010-2-28 11:14
According to United States census data, in 1975 about one-third of mothers with young children worked outside the home; in 2000, almost two-thirds of such mothers were employed outside the home.

如果选C的话，
分号的后半部分会不会就不属于｛According to United States census data｝了？
望nn指教。

好困惑的题目。

作者: azure0520 时间: 2010-6-29 12:00
我和楼上想的一样，NN来解答下吧～～

作者: 红尘道士 时间: 2010-6-29 14:35
我选c，d中的让步，不符合逻辑，而且d中的there be句型，没有必要

作者: lcj2003kit 时间: 2010-6-29 16:47
我选的C啊~~
我总觉得D里面“even though in 1975 there were about one-third of mothers with young children who worked outside the home。。。”中who worked outside home像是说young children的~晓不得是不是
继续围观。。。。。

作者: fannybeibei 时间: 2010-8-6 23:08

以下是引用幽幽sally在2006-11-17 23:12:00的发言：
24. GWD26-Q24

According to United States census data, while there was about one-third

of mothers with young children working outside the home in 1975, in 2000,

almost two-thirds of those mothers were employed outside the home.

A. while there was about one-third of mothers with young children

working outside the home in 1975, in 2000, almost two-thirds

of those mothers were employed outside the home.

B. there were about one-third of mothers with young children who

worked outside the home in 1975; in 2000, almost two-thirds

of those mothers were employed outside the home

C. in 1975 about one-third of mothers with young children worked

outside the home; in 2000, almost two-thirds of such mothers

were employed outside the home

D. even though in 1975 there were about one-third of mothers with

young children who worked outside the home, almost two-thirds

of such mothers were employed outside the home in 2000

E. with about one-third of mothers with young children working out-

side the home in 1975, almost two-thirds of such mothers were

employed outside the home in 2000

没有有人注意,those mothers 和 such mothers ?

这题和那个什么chilren在1981年和1997年画时间做功课的SC题目的A选项的they指代错误差不多的，这里的those mothers错误的指代了75年的mother,此mother非彼mother!~

-- by 会员 cccccc0 (2007/1/5 17:15:00)

STILL CONFUSED...
比较里不是都用比如cars in1800...are twice more than those produced...in 1900
也没说those就指代1800年的车的呀。。。

作者: kily8878860 时间: 2010-11-20 20:50

According to United States census data, in 1975 about one-third of mothers with young children worked outside the home; in 2000, almost two-thirds of such mothers were employed outside the home.

如果选C的话，
分号的后半部分会不会就不属于｛According to United States census data｝了？
望nn指教。

好困惑的题目。

-- by 会员 true (2010/2/28 11:14:37)

我也同意这个观点，但是这样子就没选择了，所以我最后选了个E，估计是不对的，果真错了
呵呵，不知道分号是不是没有那么强的间断句子的能力

作者: dingdingxixi 时间: 2010-11-21 09:51
围观...

一点愚见，我的答案是C
排除D的原因是1.worked修饰不明确指的是yong children还是mothers with young children?
2. even though使整句话意思让了一大步感觉从句意上和原句不是很符合

但是有几个疑问希望高人指点
1. while表示让步时和表示比较时从句意上理解有什么不同??似乎从句意上while对两种的表示都是很轻微的语气和比较都不是特别强烈和明显这使我对while的两种表示有些概念模糊
2. 可不可以将分号理解为两个独立的句子中间的连词的标点符号?分号表示的句子是否应该前后并列呢?(我有试过在word中用英文写排比句，word自动给改成分号了)...

发言完毕继续围观...等待NN

作者: bonfin 时间: 2011-5-14 11:50

1、同意楼上的观点，不过while应该是表达让步，而不是比较，我认为while表示比较的时候比较双方应该是同时发生...而且如果是比较就不能被让步的even though所代替。
2、D中的who指代children有待商棰。定语从句完全可以跳跃指代。
3、但是我无法同意C里面用分号隔开两个有关联的句子。
4、such是指同类事物，those +n. 指代前面提到的Mothers，所以such mother是对的
5、C里面用worked把原句中用there be这个表达统计数据、存在的概念给抹掉了。统计数据用there be很正常，不能以那条规则排除选项。
同意D...

- by 会员 aeoluseros (2008/9/12 6:20:00)

1.Manhattan 上有关于分号的使用：The semicolon connects two closely related statements.所以这句话可以用分号隔开，讲述两件有关的事，而没有让步语气。
2.关于while的使用，你提到的while在比较时更强调同时是正确的。OG上有句子关于比较时用while的时候说：While is somewhat ambiguous, since it might indicate simultaneity rather than contrast.（见OG12. 131题A选项分析）
3.比较讲究结构对称，这点manhattan上也说了。C和D比较，C中都是讲这样的母亲...worked/were employed outside the home，结构对称；而D选项前一句是个从句，虽然意思上表达无误，但是结构上就没有C好。另外基于第一点，even though就是多余的了。

So C is the best.

作者: ceecn2000 时间: 2011-6-17 01:42
楼上的说的好

作者: baca 时间: 2011-9-7 21:53

-- by 会员 true (2010/2/28 11:14:37)

我也同意这个观点，但是这样子就没选择了，所以我最后选了个E，估计是不对的，果真错了
呵呵，不知道分号是不是没有那么强的间断句子的能力

-- by 会员 kily8878860 (2010/11/20 20:50:28)

我也选的E，首先用such和其他方面排除了ABD，最后觉得E也说得通就选了E，我觉得原句的while有让步的意思，感觉1975的句子是从句，然后E中用with的独立主格也把重心放在了2000年的后半句，为什么C比E更好呢？

作者: myaska 时间: 2011-10-6 16:14

我也同意这个观点，但是这样子就没选择了，所以我最后选了个E，估计是不对的，果真错了
呵呵，不知道分号是不是没有那么强的间断句子的能力

-- by 会员 kily8878860 (2010/11/20 20:50:28)

-- by 会员 baca (2011/9/7 21:53:21)

个人理解，E中的with引导的短语修饰的是后面的主语two-thirds of such mothers，逻辑意思上不通。with结构表示的是一种对主语的伴随状态。显然原文表达的是两个平等的事件（1975年的情况跟2000年的情况）作比较。不存在谁伴随谁的意思。with破坏了这种平等，应该用连词或者分号连接前后两个独立的分句。

作者: 情未浓 时间: 2011-12-7 17:29

-- by 会员 bonfin (2011/5/14 11:50:29)

同意。
D用even though后，给我的感觉意思怪怪的。。

作者: 泾渭不凡 时间: 2011-12-29 17:18

定语从句跳过介词短语指代介词短语前面的成分是可以的.
while表转折比较不放在句首，表示"当...时"倒是可以，但是不符合逻辑意思.前后有不同时间的标志词，所以不能用"当...时"的意思

-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2008/9/12 7:51:00)

while的用法在prep中讲解不是很多咧，这个倒是非常好的补充，谢谢。

作者: pissunrise 时间: 2013-2-28 10:27

-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2008/9/12 6:20:00)

1、很同意while表比较时比较双方应该是同时发生，所以while在此应该表示让步；所以D中even though更与原句意思相符；
但是D中定语从句who的跳跃指代我觉得在此解释不通。在OG13中定语从句的跳跃指代都存在最近名词在逻辑上无法被定语从句修饰的问题，但是此处D中明显mother和children都可以workedoutside the home，因此指代不明。

2、第3点“分号隔开两个有关联的句子”，如前面有人提到的Manhattan中确实指明了分词可以隔开两个相互有联系的句子，所以我想你表达的意思是不应该把它们变成相互independent clause吧，但是“such mother”很明确的表示与前面的句子有联系啊，并不能说它们是完全independent的，如OG13-113，Ababy emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision thatwould be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision would be deemed legallyblind。

3、C中去掉there be应该对句子逻辑影响不大吧，毕竟前面指明了Accordingto United States
census data

我的问题是：如前面TX所说，C中用分号隔开之后，很可能表达不出后面的句子也是According to United States
census data的意思，如OG13-87中的B选项。

贴出如下：
According to scientists who monitored its path, anexpanding cloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun recently triggereda large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, which brightened theNorthern Lights and also possibly knocking out a communications satellite.
B, an expanding cloud ofenergized particles ejected from the Sun was what recently triggereda large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, and itbrightened the Northern Lights and also possibly knocked

OG：Thecomma after “earth” turns the final part of the sentence into an independentclause, and it is unclear whether this is part of what the scientists claimedor a separate claim made by the writer
但是这种问题也只在OG中出现过1次，所以不知道会不会因为“such mother”的存在使得2个句子连接更紧密，从而能表达出第2句也是according to data？

作者: 小钙盖 时间: 2013-11-18 20:41

allen0018 发表于 2006-9-6 17:41
    24. GWD26-Q24    According to United Statescensus data, ...

D中who的就近修饰有问题

作者: 我不爱养宠物 时间: 2014-11-6 15:42
考点：
逻辑语义。修饰。
A.while表示转折，也表示同时，对there be句型没好感，while句子的重心为这儿有三分之一的有孩子的母亲，句意不对，而且working分词修饰就近名词，修饰young children？逻辑不对，修饰mothers又太远。而且in 1975的位置与后半句不平行；
B.There be表存在，这句话的重心表达这儿有三分之一的有年轻小孩的母亲，改变句子重心，本来是worked outside应该是句子重心但是变成了修饰部分，其次，who从句在此处就近修饰children逻辑不对；
C.Correct，正确表达句子重心，in 1975与后面in 2000平行，对称工整；
D.Even though引导让步状语，但此处要表达的是转折对比；句子重心错误，who从句修饰错误同上述选项
E.With独立主格错误，表伴随跟表修饰都不对，此处应该是对比关系

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)