Journalist: Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run. However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission. So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.
The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist’s argument?
为什么E不行呢？如果他前几次也这样做不就是说明这次也不一定是要竞选不就是WEAKEN么？请指点
整理一下逻辑思路：
Journalist: Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run. （facts）However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy （那又如何？我认为这是gap，不代表他要竞选）by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission. So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.
AB很受欢迎，但始终没有参加竞选。
现在他the financial disclosure requirement （布等于他要参加）
结论：AB会成为候选人。
结论若成立，有两个隐藏的假设：
1 fulfill the financial disclosure requirement 等于他要参加
2 很受欢迎===〉成为候选人。
E和第一个假设相关。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |