ChaseDream
标题: OG第33题 [打印本页]
作者: andy100 时间: 2003-10-13 05:03
标题: OG第33题
From the earliest days of the tribe, kinship determined the way in which the Ojibwa society organized its labor, provided access to its resources, and defined rights and obligations involved in the distribution and consumption of those resources.
(A)and defined rights and obligations involved in the distribution and consumption of those resources
(C)and defined rights and obligations as they were involved in its distribution and consumption
我认为A的involved也会产生歧义,可以被认为只修饰obligations而不修饰rights,如果用which were involved才算清晰。OG解释: Choice C preserves parallelism but is wordy, and its has no logical referent. 我认为its指代the Ojibwa society跟前两个分句中的its并列。
不知各位有何高见?
作者: sbbi 时间: 2003-10-13 06:23
但C没讲清distribution and consumption of WHAT
作者: yoplait 时间: 2003-10-13 13:36
if C, there would be the same problem as A. "They" can only modified "obligations" but no "rights".
Or we can treat "rights and obligations" as an idiom; thus will no misunderstanding.
作者: waterflea 时间: 2003-10-13 15:19
its肯定不是指Ojibwa society而是resources,所以必然错。
作者: andy100 时间: 2003-10-13 18:31
明白了,谢谢各位指点!
作者: cg 时间: 2005-7-15 17:42
OG 33 . From the earliest days of the tribe, kinship determined the way in which
the Ojibwa society organized its labor, provided access to its resources,
and defined rights and obligations involved in the distribution and
consumption of those resources.
(A) and defined rights and obligations involved in the distribution and consumption of those resources
(B) defining rights and obligations involved in their distribution and consumption
(C) and defined rights and obligations as they were involved in its distribution and consumption
(D) whose rights and obligations were defined in their distribution and consumption
(E) the distribution and consumption of them defined by rights and obligations
Choice C preserves parallelism but is wordy, and its has no logical reference.
its 為什麼不是指代前面 the Ojibwa society ?
另外发现一点 除了正确的A选项 in the distribution and consumption of those resources外 其它选项 都没有指定of those resources, 可以用这点删除其它选项吗?![](/static/legacy-emoticon/Dvbbs/em09.gif)
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-18 17:06:56编辑过]
作者: cg 时间: 2005-7-17 11:11
up
作者: cg 时间: 2005-7-18 17:09
是问了笨问题吗?
没人回答 ![](/static/legacy-emoticon/Dvbbs/em06.gif)
作者: jingechasedream 时间: 2005-7-18 23:31
its distribution and consumption 中的its假如理解为 SOCIETY,我认为是很蹩脚的英文,英文应该不会这样表达这种意思.
作者: Kiteliu 时间: 2005-7-19 14:14
Those Resouces 是一个补足的新名词,使句子含义更加清晰!
作者: fuyun 时间: 2005-9-14 04:45
前面的并列结构中都用到了organized its labor, provided access to its resources来指代Ojibwa society, 选项C里为什么its 就没有逻辑指代对象了呢?
作者: fuyun 时间: 2005-9-19 01:03
up.up
作者: violetleaf 时间: 2005-9-27 21:12
有哪位NN可以帮忙回答为什么 its 不是指代前面的OJIBWA SOCIETY ?
作者: arrow9999 时间: 2005-9-28 08:21
我是菜菜,积极讨论:
C的its should be the referent of resources,于是:
1。resources是复数
2。如果指代Ojibwa society 句子就不完整了:distribution and consumption of WHAT of Ojibwa society
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-11-18 7:58:55编辑过]
作者: carol1216 时间: 2005-9-28 08:46
我觉得分配和消费只能针对资源(resourse)来说,如果认为its指代society,意思就是社会的分配和消费,感觉怪怪的。
discussion is welcome
作者: hyte 时间: 2006-2-13 20:44
以下是引用carol1216在2005-9-28 8:46:00的发言:我觉得分配和消费只能针对资源(resourse)来说,如果认为its指代society,意思就是社会的分配和消费,感觉怪怪的。
discussion is welcome
同意! 做SC還是得以句意為優先~分配跟消費當然是指resources~不可能是society~句意很怪!![](/static/legacy-emoticon/Dvbbs/em04.gif)
作者: cccccc0 时间: 2006-10-12 21:03
those指代什么呢??还是没弄明白阿~~~![](/static/legacy-emoticon/Dvbbs/em06.gif)
![](/static/legacy-emoticon/Dvbbs/em06.gif)
![](/static/legacy-emoticon/Dvbbs/em06.gif)
作者: cccccc0 时间: 2006-10-12 21:07
又回味了一下nn们的贴~~现在明白了~~those refers to resources![](/static/legacy-emoticon/Dvbbs/em01.gif)
![](/static/legacy-emoticon/Dvbbs/em01.gif)
作者: 晴天小狗 时间: 2006-10-17 14:25
those这里不是指代的意思吧? 我找不到他指代谁
nn帮忙看看
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-17 16:42:25编辑过]
作者: amy7777 时间: 2006-10-17 16:59
those 作形容词,这题偶以前也问过,呵呵。
作者: 晴天小狗 时间: 2006-10-17 17:26
恩 那就对了
我就是觉得根本不是指代
thx
作者: Valpo 时间: 2009-6-20 05:07
rights and obligations 是一体的,一个完整概念,同时出现
作者: 小羽羽 时间: 2010-8-1 10:29
that,this,those,these除了在比较句型中可以指代,其他一律不能单独指代
those在这里只能是形容词,无指代的问题
C中的its无逻辑中的指代对象,如果指代前面的复合名词,主谓不一致,指代society逻辑不对
作者: coloryoung 时间: 2010-10-17 22:12
that,this,those,these除了在比较句型中可以指代,其他一律不能单独指代
those在这里只能是形容词,无指代的问题
C中的its无逻辑中的指代对象,如果指代前面的复合名词,主谓不一致,指代society逻辑不对
-- by 会员 小羽羽 (2010/8/1 10:29:38)
很清楚,谢谢~![](/static/legacy-emoticon/12.gif)
作者: lusfe 时间: 2011-4-3 16:25
mark一下:
C 中的 its 如果指代 society,则改变 原句句意; 如果指代 those resources,1.主谓不一致 2.不应该是主格
作者: flhuihui1001 时间: 2013-11-21 21:47
但是manhattan明确说过: 同一句话里面的it和its只能指代同一个对象, 如果its指代resouce的话就是硬伤,不应该指代resources
在GMATCLUB中找到了对此题的解答,可供参考:
Clearly C) is wrong.
(C) and defined rights and obligations as they were involved in its distribution and consumption
here "they" is incorrectly referring to "tribe" which is singular and was referred to using "it" as in "its labor" and "its resources".
Also, "its" in "its distribution" is incorrectly referring to plural 'resources'
作者: 我要喝可乐 时间: 2015-12-5 11:19
这个解释的好清楚!
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |