ChaseDream

标题: [求助]GWD23-32 [打印本页]
作者: liuyanxin    时间: 2006-8-24 11:05
标题: [求助]GWD23-32

Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered numerous detailed mosaics depicting several readily identifiable animal species:  a hare, a partridge, and various Mediterranean fish.  Oddly, most of the species represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these mosaics were created.  Since identical motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman cities, however, the mosaics of Sepphoris were very likely created by traveling artisans from some other part of the Roman Empire.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

  1. The Sepphoris mosaics are not composed exclusively of types of stones found naturally in the Sepphoris area.

  2. There is no single region to which all the species depicted in the Sepphoris mosaics are native.

  3. No motifs appear in the Sepphoris mosaics that do not also appear in the mosaics of some other Roman city.

  4. All of the animal figures in the Sepphoris mosaics are readily identifiable as representations of known species.

  5. There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman Empire were familiar.

the anwser if E. Why?

作者: caterpillarcn    时间: 2006-8-24 12:02

There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman Empire were familiar.

就是说大家都在用一个通用的格式来做mosaic， 就是说虽然你亲眼见过某个东西，但你还是知道它。

作者: gc0207    时间: 2006-10-21 01:33
应该用取非削弱吧 结论是mosaics是从别的地方带来的 如果E取非就是不同地方都有相同的设计 也就削弱了结论 应该是选E

作者: 期待蔚蓝    时间: 2006-10-27 14:42

文中说了不同地方的设计都是不同的了么？

我怎么觉得E无关啊！

作者: 期待蔚蓝    时间: 2006-12-30 00:00
up!!!
作者: gonghao    时间: 2006-12-30 15:08

I think the answer should be E.

In the arg ,it is said that the animal which were depicted in mosaic had never been live when the mosaic was created.So author think it was created by someone came from another place.

If there is a place where most of artists in different areas could saw and share the information.or there was a common design everybody was familar.Then the artists who live in S could make the motifs ,too.Then the conclusion would be weaken. 

作者: zzlz    时间: 2007-1-11 17:00
以下是引用caterpillarcn在2006-8-24 12:02:00的发言：

There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman Empire were familiar.

就是说大家都在用一个通用的格式来做mosaic， 就是说虽然你亲眼见过某个东西，但你还是知道它。

解释很好.足够清晰了.

作者: chanx_ceci    时间: 2007-8-23 14:09
up
作者: 阿土莎莎    时间: 2007-12-5 18:59
up
作者: eileenmu木    时间: 2008-3-23 20:54
up
作者: eileenmu木    时间: 2008-3-23 21:12
以下是引用caterpillarcn在2006-8-24 12:02:00的发言：

There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman Empire were familiar.

就是说大家都在用一个通用的格式来做mosaic， 就是说虽然你亲眼见过某个东西，但你还是知道它。

NN是不是笔误了？   应该是 “ 虽然没亲眼见过某个东西，还是知道”吧
作者: loveyouzh    时间: 2008-4-21 06:47
有道理
作者: lichabrend    时间: 2008-5-30 11:21
up
作者: ricky_w    时间: 2008-7-23 15:17
明白，多谢
作者: ruru8ruru8    时间: 2008-7-27 14:49

如果有通用的设计格式，且住在不同地区的手工艺家都熟悉此格式，那么住在Sepphoris的手工艺家也可做出此种mosaic了。这样结论就被推翻。

因此E：没有通用的设计格式　即是正确答案

作者: brass20y    时间: 2008-11-28 10:54
nan
作者: yzhao26    时间: 2009-3-4 11:25
up
作者: tankobe    时间: 2009-9-24 17:14

C为什么不对?

C：在motif中,没有那种在sepphorics没出现同时在other roman city也没出现的animal spieces.

C取非:在motifs中,有一些在other roman city也没出现的animal spieces.

按照原题的推理逻辑:

既然有一些animal spieces在other roman city也没出现,那么motifs就不可能是travelling artisans from other roman city跑到sepphorics去创作的了.

即C取非否定原结论.

所以我认为现C

作者: iceland17    时间: 2009-10-6 23:12
以下是引用tankobe在2009/9/24 17:14:00的发言：

C为什么不对?

C：在motif中,没有那种在sepphorics没出现同时在other roman city也没出现的animal spieces.

C取非:在motifs中,有一些在other roman city也没出现的animal spieces.

按照原题的推理逻辑:

既然有一些animal spieces在other roman city也没出现,那么motifs就不可能是travelling artisans from other roman city跑到sepphorics去创作的了.

即C取非否定原结论.

所以我认为现C

个人愚见,取反应该是有一些motifs出现在其他地区的mosaics没有出现过的Sepphoris mosaics中,应该还构不成削弱吧,因为题目说most of the species,那些可能就是其中的小部分~~既然有些是native的,那么就构不成削弱了吧~~

作者: 克克里斯蒂    时间: 2011-7-1 15:58
C为什么不对?
C：在motif中,没有那种在sepphorics没出现同时在other roman city也没出现的animal spieces.
C取非:在motifs中,有一些在other roman city也没出现的animal spieces.
按照原题的推理逻辑:
既然有一些animal spieces在other roman city也没出现,那么motifs就不可能是travelling artisans from other roman city跑到sepphorics去创作的了.
即C取非否定原结论.
所以我认为现C
-- by 会员 tankobe (2009/9/24 17:14:00)



我本来也选了C
后来看原文中： Since identical motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman cities
C的假设是多此一举了吧






作者: flonacui    时间: 2013-4-20 21:19
zhichi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3