没有问这个题的啊
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people’s intentions as relevant to punishment.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?
(A) In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.
(B) In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated.
(C) Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children.
(D) The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment.
(E) The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.
答案是A，我选的是E。
为什么E不对阿，小孩子们没有根据伤害为故意或无意来调整惩罚，是因为他们用伤害的强烈程度来决定惩罚，而并不是没有把人的意识看成是决定惩罚程度的因素，这不是削弱吗？
即；题干为A现象（小孩子们没有根据伤害为故意或无意来调整惩罚）推出B为原因（小孩们没有把人的意识看成是决定惩罚的因素），若C(小孩用伤害的强烈程度来决定惩罚)原因也可以推出A现象，那对B不正是一种削弱吗？
PS;这道题的题干是因果结构吧？
我是新手，多多关照啊~~
"为什么E不对阿，小孩子们没有根据伤害为故意或无意来调整惩罚，是因为他们用伤害的强烈程度来决定惩罚，而并不是没有把人的意识看成是决定惩罚程度的因素，这不是削弱吗？"
原文用的是否定, E是支持了.
谢谢版主gg啊~好像明白点了~
好像是自己把自己绕进去了~~
呵呵~谢谢gg回答我这些比较笨的问题哦~谢谢哦~~
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |