蔽人在做題目, 很多也做錯了, 看完答案也不得其解. 其中一條是這樣的:
Historian:
We can learn about the medical history of individuals through chemical analysis of their hair. It’s likely, for example, that Issac Newton’s psychological problems were due to mercury poisoning; traces of mercury were found in his hair. Analysis is now being done on a lock of Beethoven’s hair. Although no convincing argument has shown that Beethoven ever had a venereal disease, some people hypothesize that venereal disease caused his deafness. Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven’s time to treat venereal disease, if researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that his hypothesis is correct.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the historian’s argument depends?
Source: 新東方
我選了A, 但答案是B, 為甚麼嗎?
Sorry... What question number? How can I make link?
it's a very loose weaken.eliminate other fator.
if everyone digest mercury, how can u say B's containing of mercury was for the cure of verneral disease.
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |