ChaseDream

标题: 求助!!OG逻辑第79题,请大牛们帮我讲解,谢谢! [打印本页]

作者: ritazai    时间: 2006-7-29 13:00
标题: 求助!!OG逻辑第79题,请大牛们帮我讲解,谢谢!

OG逻辑的第79题,我连题目和答案都看了好几遍,但是还是没有完全搞懂,我知道肯定是自己够菜的了,但是还是希望那位高手愿意替我讲解一下,PS: 我8月31日要在广州考试了,谢谢!!

OG-79

79. When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, “No.” Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

 

Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

A.      Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”?

B.      Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?

C.      Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?

D.     Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?

E.      Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

 

Answer:

Since the questions elicits a reply, the question was presumably heard, but presumably not by the part that is deaf. The explanation’s obvious weakness, therefore, is that it fails to indicate why the part that replies would reply as if it were the part that is deaf. Choice A points to this failure and is the best answer.

Choice B does not challenge the explanation itself, but the need for an explanation in the first place. Choices C and D raise pertinent questions concerning the facts described, but do not address the proffered explanation of those facts. Choice E points to a question to which the attempted explanation gives rises, but does not challenge the adequacy of the explanation.


作者: caterpillarcn    时间: 2006-7-29 18:05

hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

要找出可以证明the part that is deaf 和 the part that replies 没有被dissociated的选项, 如果真的是被dissociated的话,应该乱答一气或者根本就不答才对啊, 那说明这两个部分没有被dissociated。所以是A
B&E 不知所云, C&D 是质疑催眠的真实性,而不是文中的论点。
这个题有点歪,我也不是很明白,转不太过来,感觉D也挺像,不过<A 罢了。

8月31考哈,我比你早一天。 复习了半个月了,感觉有点疲了,都想提前考试了。
时间足够用的,不用着急。


作者: ritazai    时间: 2006-7-29 23:27

谢谢!这样理解79题的逻辑关系可能会清晰一点,其实我是想知道题目还有答案第一段的解说的明确意思。我OG上的题目已经过了两遍,现在正在看OG后面的解释,希望能得到一些新的东西。是啊~!复习不能拖得太长,超累的,身体上和思想上都是,你也加油咯!!






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3