ChaseDream
标题: GWD3-18 [打印本页]
作者: 无比 时间: 2006-7-26 15:39
标题: GWD3-18
Which of following most logically completes the argument?
The last members of a now-extinct species of a European wild deer called the giant dear lived in Ireland about 16,000 years ago. Prehistoric cave paintings in France depict this animal as having a large hump on its back. Fossils of this animal, however, do not show any hump. Nevertheless, there is no reason to conclude that the cave paintings are therefore inaccurate in this regard, since ______.
- some prehistoric cave paintings in France also depict other animals as having a hump
- fossils of the giant deer are much more common in Ireland than in France
- animal humps are composed of fatty tissue, which dose not fossilize
- the cave paintings of the giant deer were painted well before 16,000 years ago
- only one currently existing species of deer has any anatomical feature that even remotely resembles a hump
答案是不是选择C呢?
没能搜到这个题目的讨论贴,所以发了新的帖子~~
说说我的理解~
A:如果别的动物的 PAINTING 也画了驼峰,那么说明古人喜欢在所有动物身上画驼峰,不管这个动物有没有驼峰.因而是削弱的.
B.化石的普遍与否和题目所问的内容--PAINTING所画的是否精确无关,因而是无关项.
C.因为化石不含有驼峰的脂肪组织,因而很可能是DEER活着的时候有驼峰,而变为化石后, 驼峰的脂肪组织没有变为化石的一部分..
D.与时间无关
E.与现存的DEER无关
作者: 无比 时间: 2006-7-26 15:40
大家一起来讨论~给点意见~~~
作者: LeLe123 时间: 2006-7-26 16:04
yes, C, no doubt.
作者: gonghao 时间: 2006-7-26 16:12
yes,correct answer is C
作者: 无比 时间: 2006-7-26 16:32
原来是因为太简单了没有人有疑惑呢呵呵 ~~~
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |