ChaseDream

标题: 再次请教GWD的17-6,困扰但没有答案 [打印本页]

作者: mywaymydream    时间: 2006-7-20 12:34
标题: 再次请教GWD的17-6,困扰但没有答案

Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by 因为是被respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by 所以sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

 

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?

 

 

A.       Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.

B.       The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.

C.       The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.

D.       The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.

E.        Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

我认为要反对是secretary’s argument ,secretary论证过程中的矛盾点是 nonpartisan auditors和 not partisan politics的关系,所以E选项是对的,但是答案给出的是C,请教请教.


作者: gonghao    时间: 2006-7-20 13:37

not+weaken

B

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=74306&replyID=&skin=1






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3