ChaseDream

标题: gwd26-20 [打印本页]

作者: joanna143 时间: 2006-7-4 18:38
标题: gwd26-20

In 1981 children in the United States spent an average of slightly less than two and a half hours a week doing household chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.

A. chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week

B. chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly six hours a week

C. chores, whereas nearly six hours a week were spent in 1997

D. chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997

E. chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997

正确答案B，请教E错在哪里?

作者: joanna143 时间: 2006-7-5 20:20

顶

拜托斑斑们看看哪

作者: hsyeng 时间: 2006-8-14 21:25
頂頂頂我也選E～

作者: hsyeng 时间: 2006-8-15 09:28
仔細想想 E會不會改變了句意造成growing這個動作是在1997那年完成的並不是一路成長到1997

作者: hhhhhhzzzzzz 时间: 2006-10-8 07:51
B不對阿 in 1981...spent....; by 1997 that..had grown
1997用過去完成時，發生在1981之前？
這怎麽合乎邏輯？A,B都這毛病，排除，C被動, D compare with用的不對

我也選E

作者: cwcc 时间: 2006-12-20 11:25
why D is not correct?
I prefer this one

作者: xizzhu 时间: 2006-12-20 11:51

以下是引用joanna143在2006-7-4 18:38:00的发言：

In 1981 children in the United States spent an average of slightly less than two and a half hours a week doing household chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.

A. chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week

B. chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly six hours a week

C. chores, whereas nearly six hours a week were spent in 1997

D. chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997

E. chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997

正确答案B，请教E错在哪里?

B is the best. it's the year of 2006. Thus, by 1997 + 过去完成时也没错. 前半句的一般过去时是为了说一过去的事实.

E is wrong due to its structure, which is sentence,+ N1. (N1= that figure) But "that figure" 不是 chores 的宾同. Moreover, the meaning of "in 1997" is completely different from that of "by 1997".

作者: abort 时间: 2006-12-20 12:06
vote for B
by前面有；是另外一句话了，而by 1997说明是某件事情在以前已经结束

作者: bluevivi001 时间: 2007-2-28 03:59

我也同意选E. 有人能指出E有什么问题吗？

作者: Zeldaw 时间: 2007-2-28 12:34
支持E，不理解B的过去完成时

作者: mbz 时间: 2007-2-28 13:01

B is correct.

E is wrong because the words in red can not be attached to the main sentence correctly.

E. chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997

B is correct because there are two independent sentences. Hence, the ppt is acceptable.

作者: tiantianlala 时间: 2007-2-28 14:36

以下是引用abort在2006-12-20 12:06:00的发言：
vote for B
by前面有；是另外一句话了，而by 1997说明是某件事情在以前已经结束

这个解释很清楚地解释了为什么B对而E错.

作者: cherryacer 时间: 2007-2-28 16:05
分号前后是两句话，D选项显然后面一句话不完整的，所以不能选。

作者: chamcham 时间: 2007-6-18 15:46

以下是引用xizzhu在2006-12-20 11:51:00的发言：

B is the best. it's the year of 2006. Thus, by 1997 + 过去完成时也没错. 前半句的一般过去时是为了说一过去的事实.

I thought this question is a real one in 1996. Just kidding

作者: colorful_na 时间: 2007-7-12 10:20
kan

作者: NANA2016 时间: 2007-7-12 12:58
支持B,BY THE 1997,意思是这个事一直到1997年,它从1981年到1997年,这个数据是从过去一直保持增长到1997的,
大家要清楚过去完成时,过去完成时表示到过去某时刻为止,已经完成了的事.
表示过去某一时刻的短语,多由介词BY引出,说明时间的截止.

而且个人觉得E有结构问题,THAT FIGURE GROWING TO ..感觉少了一个谓语助词.

作者: woaicc 时间: 2007-7-13 04:01

E.改变句子的重心了.句子本来要表达增长快,对比强烈...可E成了强调1981年的情况了

作者: llxx1985cn 时间: 2007-8-21 08:07
up

作者: mimixiaxia 时间: 2007-8-31 10:10
UP

作者: 阿土莎莎 时间: 2007-12-5 19:08

作者: missilezy 时间: 2007-12-12 23:05
选E的能说一下 that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997的是做什么成分？伴随行动状语？还是什么独立主格？

作者: sch 时间: 2008-2-22 07:34

E后面是 fragment.

that figure本身也不是前面的同位语.所以E肯定错/

有人给说说为啥C错了么?

作者: klhyy 时间: 2008-5-26 22:37
c

作者: xiaoda 时间: 2008-7-3 12:35
up

作者: 水里游 时间: 2008-10-5 20:23
up

作者: bluebus0831 时间: 2009-5-7 20:52
up

作者: tiffany1102 时间: 2009-5-18 15:52
UP.

作者: VeniceBingo 时间: 2009-9-23 19:47

c是不是错在spend不能用被动?

作者: gerrard 时间: 2009-10-15 00:22

c.whereas nearly six hours a week were
spent in 1997

b. by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly
six hours a week

d. chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997

c没有语法错误，但是不能表达出完成时态，即也许1996时数字不变，1997这一年突然增加的；并且才C的被动语态导致其表达不精准，又WHEREAS 连接两个完整的句子，6 HOURS WERE SPENT 不知道是用在什么上面了。被动语态也改变了句子重心。就像管大侠说的，语法题不一定都有语法错误，商业英文比较的是精准表达.

d句尾过去分词前面不管有无逗号，都是修饰紧邻前面的名词，不能跳跃修饰

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/15 0:39:14编辑过]

作者: lmiltamy 时间: 2010-4-29 15:55
[quote]
c.whereas nearly six hours a week were
spent in 1997
b. by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly
six hours a week
d. chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997

c没有语法错误，但是不能表达出完成时态，即也许1996时数字不变，1997这一年突然增加的；并且才C的被动语态导致其表达不精准，又WHEREAS 连接两个完整的句子，6 HOURS WERE SPENT 不知道是用在什么上面了。被动语态也改变了句子重心。就像管大侠说的，语法题不一定都有语法错误，商业英文比较的是精准表达.
d句尾过去分词前面不管有无逗号，都是修饰紧邻前面的名词，不能跳跃修饰

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/15 0:39:14编辑过]

-- by 会员 gerrard (2009/10/15 0:22:00)

[/quote
i am so confused. please help!!

ed句尾过去分词前面不管有无逗号，都是修饰紧邻前面的名词，不能跳跃修饰

名词,ing 分词"这种情况多数是分词结构修饰前面一个句子, 只有在特定的语境下,分词才修饰前面的名词. 如果名词后面没有逗号,直接加分词,分词是修饰这个名词的.

求這二句話的不同!!
謝謝

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)