79 When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, “No.” Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”?
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?
weaken的话A没有问题。但对于D这样的反问句，似乎也是在weaken啊
为什么hypnotized subjects总是一个回答，这个似乎也是在说老是在回答yes或者老是在回答NO。这样回答就不是随机的，从而削弱了结论。这样理解D的话，D是否有可能也该是答案呢？
那个D好象不能weaken原文.就算是他们的回答总是一个NO或YES.也不能weaken原文的"the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies." 个人看法
A的意思不就是说，为什么没人回答yes嘛？也就是说答案应该是随机的yes和no都该有
那这个D似乎也再说他们的答案不随机，老是以同一个方式回答，也该是说明他不随机啊。不是也应该weaken了嘛？
A的意思不就是说，为什么没人回答yes嘛？也就是说答案应该是随机的yes和no都该有
那这个D似乎也再说他们的答案不随机，老是以同一个方式回答，也该是说明他不随机啊。不是也应该weaken了嘛？
不是这样的.这题的思考点就在于: 如果deaf了,那他们还能reply NO吗? 不是随机的问题.楼主再想想.
另外你看看这个贴子:
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=170648&replyID=1606070&skin=1
最后的yaoyao的回贴,我比较认同.
The theory: subject is separated into 2 parts
1. the deaf part
2. the part that replies (but not deaf)
If part 1 were in control, then the subject shouldn't reply.
If part 2 were in control, then the subject should reply "yes" (choice A).
我就是看了这帖子没明白，或者说我更加觉得D也是在weaken了
A，我没问题，reply的部分应该是说yes的，但是没有，所以被weaken
D：为什么所有的subjects都按一个方式回答。意思就是应该是不同的意思回答。因为【If part 1 were in control, then the subject shouldn't reply.If part 2 were in control, then the subject should reply "yes" .】所以不应该是同一个方式回答“yes或者no”的。也就是说 the part that replies 应是yes，the deaf part应该是no。我觉的和A一样啊
The theory: subject is separated into 2 parts
1. the deaf part
2. the part that replies (but not deaf)
If part 1 were in control, then the subject shouldn't reply.
If part 2 were in control, then the subject should reply "yes" (choice A).
我就是看了这帖子没明白，或者说我更加觉得D也是在weaken了
A，我没问题，reply的部分应该是说yes的，但是没有，所以被weaken
D：为什么所有的subjects都按一个方式回答。意思就是应该是不同的意思回答。因为【If part 1 were in control, then the subject shouldn't reply.If part 2 were in control, then the subject should reply "yes" .】所以不应该是同一个方式回答“yes或者no”的。也就是说 the part that replies 应是yes，the deaf part应该是no。我觉的和A一样啊
If part 1 were in control, then the subject shouldn't reply.
If part 2 were in control, then the subject should reply "yes".
这里只有yes, 没有回答no的呀. Part1的话就不能回答了.
那提干里说了
问他们是否听见，他们说NO
明明回答了啊，而不是【shouldn't reply.】
难道你的意思是
yes和no都是reply部分发出的？
我觉的reply no只是回答研究人员的问题“是否听见之前的东西”，他说no，意思就是没有听到
而不该是理解成，没有听到就和一个电线杆一样，一语不发啊，他回答no其实就是因为deaf的部分造成的啊
难道你的意思是
yes和no都是reply部分发出的？
是的.
明白了
在催眠的过程中，听见才有回答，且答案只有yes，表示听见。要么就是沉默，表示没有听见
NO在催眠过程中不是正常的答案，NO只有当清醒了以后，别人问起来，才会回答
这道题有点象，有人敲门问“里面有人吗”，里面有人说“没有”。。。
我今天做到这题，感觉是我做到的CR里面最难的了。。。-.-
感觉OG11的解释还算清楚一点
A,C,D, and E in fact pinpoint the weeknesses of the theory from different aspects.
Why A is right? How to eliminate C,D and E? What's the reasoning line for FLAW questions?
Please advise.
明白了
在催眠的过程中，听见才有回答，且答案只有yes，表示听见。要么就是沉默，表示没有听见
NO在催眠过程中不是正常的答案，NO只有当清醒了以后，别人问起来，才会回答
When I was reading the first sentence in the stimulus --"When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply "No." " -- I noticed the response " No" is againt common sense, the subject should answer "Yes" instead when prompted in hypnosis state.
The reasoning for each choice:
A -- use the theory to contradict its evidence
B-- irrelevant
C-- challenge the theory's assumption
D-- challenge the theory itself, because either deaf part or response part will be in charge and hence the answer cound be "yes", "no" or "unresponsive" rather than "no" alone
E--challengge the theory itself, because if selves can be dissociated, hearing part can also exist besides deaf part and response part.
Why A is right? How to eliminate C, D and E?
原文一共两句话：
现象（第一句）：when hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "no"
解释现象（第二句）：some theorists try to explain......from the part that replies. =>人催眠后被分为两部分，聋的一部分只听，不聋的一部分只说。所以，问被催眠的人是不是聋子时，他回答"NO"。
(A) why does the part that replies not answer "yes"?
对“现象解释”提问。
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?
对"现象"提问，和“现象解释”无关。
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
对"现象"提问，和“现象解释”无关。
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?
和原文的“现象解释”不冲突；原文的解释就是一种说明，为什么被催眠的人都回答NO。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |