Q26:In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Some commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. These commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious: clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
包含compensation for whiplash injuries 的国家reports of whiplash injuries 比例高
Some commentators 说虚假的reports不能readily identified
作者说:有一半的确是虚假reports,然后说是不cover whiplash injuries的国家have little incentive to report
我搞不懂其中的逻辑:commentators认为比列高是因为虚假报告多,而作者说是因为比列低的国家人们很少报告,以此来反驳?
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |