ChaseDream

标题: gwd-29-7 [打印本页]

作者: cournot    时间: 2006-6-15 06:17
标题: gwd-29-7

Q7:Until a few centuries ago, any large bones discovered in the fields or caves of Europe, now known to be large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed to be the remains of giants and were often displayed as curiosities in castles, palaces, town halls, churches, and monasteries.

  1. now known to be large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed to be

  2. presently known as from large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed as

  3. bones now known to be those of large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed to be

  4. bones known at present as of large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed as those of

  5. currently known as those of large prehistoric animals, were usually assumed to be those of  

the answer is C,what's wrong with the A-seems more concise


作者: 顾风    时间: 2006-6-15 11:12
now known修饰歧义,如果不加bones,它可以修饰 fields or caves
作者: cournot    时间: 2006-6-15 23:12
THANKS!
作者: mymengming    时间: 2006-7-26 21:39

now known to be large prehistoric animals

骨头只能是骨头不能是动物


作者: 布瓜丫丫    时间: 2006-9-16 10:41

可是B为什么不对呢?


作者: mbz    时间: 2006-9-16 10:49

"assumed as" is wrong

also, "presently known" has no clear referents. 


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-9-16 10:50:13编辑过]

作者: 布瓜丫丫    时间: 2006-9-16 11:41

噢,知道了!!非常感谢!!


作者: windy_city    时间: 2006-10-13 11:47
那这个句子的主语是什么?第一个bone和第二个bone之间是什么关系,晕啊
作者: xiangqinzh    时间: 2006-11-3 22:52

那这个句子的主语是什么?第一个bone和第二个bone之间是什么关系,晕啊

第二个bone  跟  第一个bone是一个意思,因为中间有插入语,这样避免歧义


作者: xiaoniuren    时间: 2009-8-4 21:49
D
作者: 典座    时间: 2020-6-28 10:53
mbz 发表于 2006-9-16 10:49
"assumed as" is wrongalso, "presently known" has no clear referents. [此贴子已经被作者于20 ...

不是很懂as 和to be怎么用,有没有大侠帮忙区分一下?以这道题为例




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3