A medieval manuscript called L contains all eighteen extant tragedies
by the Greek playwright Euripides. Of these, ten called the “select
plays,” are accompanied in L by ancient commentaries and also
appear in other medieval manuscripts; this group includes some of
Euripides’ best-known works, including the Medea. The other eight,
which appear in alphabetical order, without commentary. The Electra is
one of the alphabeticals.
Which of the following can be reliably concluded on the basis of the
Statements given?
A. Only Euripides’ best-known works are accompanied by ancient
commentaries in extant medieval manuscripts.
B. The select plays are accompanied by ancient commentaries
because they were the best known of Euripides’ works.
C. No commentaries were written about Euripides’ Electra in
ancient times.
D. Euripides’ Medea never appears in medieval manuscripts
unaccompanied by ancient commentary.
E. Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a com-
mentary in any extant medieval manuscript.
答案是E,但我觉得选D,请NN指教!谢谢
XIEXIE!
但我对E中in any extant medieval manuscript无法理解,太绝对了,觉得不是原文的意思,望NN指点
恍然大悟,谢谢
中世纪的一本破书L里面有18个悲剧,10个有古代的评注,且这10部在其他中世纪的破书里也有,这10部有一些是Euripides这个破人写的。Medea是10分之一
另外8部按字母排的,没有评注,Electra是8分之一
Medea是10分之一,Euripides写的,有古人评注,其他书里有
Electra是8分之一,不知道谁写的,没评注,其他书里没有
D 。Euripides’ Medea never appears in medieval manuscripts unaccompanied by ancient commentary错。1.明明其他的破书里有
E。Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary in any extant medieval manuscript.对。
有古人评注,所以不会有中世纪人的评注
中世纪的一本破书L里面有18个悲剧,10个有古代的评注,且这10部在其他中世纪的破书里也有,这10部有一些是Euripides这个破人写的。Medea是10分之一
另外8部按字母排的,没有评注,Electra是8分之一
Medea是10分之一,Euripides写的,有古人评注,其他书里有
Electra是8分之一,不知道谁写的,没评注,其他书里没有
D 。Euripides’ Medea never appears in medieval manuscripts unaccompanied by ancient commentary错。1.明明其他的破书里有
E。Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary in any extant medieval manuscript.对。
有古人评注,所以不会有中世纪人的评注
感谢!!!!!11
中世纪的一本破书L里面有18个悲剧,10个有古代的评注,且这10部在其他中世纪的破书里也有,这10部有一些是Euripides这个破人写的。Medea是10分之一
另外8部按字母排的,没有评注,Electra是8分之一
Medea是10分之一,Euripides写的,有古人评注,其他书里有
Electra是8分之一,不知道谁写的,没评注,其他书里没有
D 。Euripides’ Medea never appears in medieval manuscripts unaccompanied by ancient commentary错。1.明明其他的破书里有
E。Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary in any extant medieval manuscript.对。
有古人评注,所以不会有中世纪人的评
I don't know which one is the right answer, but do know Electra also wrote by Euripides. (See the first sentence).
中世纪的一本破书L里面有18个悲剧,10个有古代的评注,且这10部在其他中世纪的破书里也有,这10部有一些是Euripides这个破人写的。Medea是10分之一
另外8部按字母排的,没有评注,Electra是8分之一
Medea是10分之一,Euripides写的,有古人评注,其他书里有
Electra是8分之一,不知道谁写的,没评注,其他书里没有
D 。Euripides’ Medea never appears in medieval manuscripts unaccompanied by ancient commentary错。1.明明其他的破书里有
E。Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary in any extant medieval manuscript.对。
有古人评注,所以不会有中世纪人的评注
BB 我只有一点不明白,
文章中没有说到: Electra 有没有古人的评注 吧?
只是说到, 中世纪手稿中, Electra 没有评注
how about C ?
i feel that the relevant factor in this argument is "with or without commentaries".
however, we cannot assert that just as E does. C is better.
还是感觉都不对阿,E要是any改成all还差不多,
高人指点下阿
还是感觉都不对阿,E要是any改成all还差不多,
高人指点下阿 m
I dont agree, please explain furthermore.
The passage doesnt say that only L contains all Euripides' tragedies. There is a possibity that other manuscripts contain Euripide' tragedies too.
注意题干中
A medieval manuscript called L contains all eighteen extant tragedies by the Greek playwright Euripides.
指所有现存的的希腊悲剧, 因此非十即八
中世纪的一本破书L里面有18个悲剧,10个有古代的评注,且这10部在其他中世纪的破书里也有,这10部有一些是Euripides这个破人写的。Medea是10分之一
另外8部按字母排的,没有评注,Electra是8分之一
Medea是10分之一,Euripides写的,有古人评注,其他书里有
Electra是8分之一,不知道谁写的,没评注,其他书里没有
D 。Euripides’ Medea never appears in medieval manuscripts unaccompanied by ancient commentary错。1.明明其他的破书里有
E。Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary in any extant medieval manuscript.对。
有古人评注,所以不会有中世纪人的评注
有古人评注, 后人就不能再评注了? 这种说法站不住脚.
读题N遍,快疯了,怎么看怎么觉得都不对,最后选了B, 认为其描述没有那么绝对.
A medieval manuscript called L contains all eighteen extant tragedies
by the Greek playwright Euripides. Of these, ten called the “select
plays,” are accompanied in L by ancient commentaries and also
appear in other medieval manuscripts; this group includes some of
Euripides’ best-known works, including the Medea. The other eight,
which appear in alphabetical order, without commentary. The Electra is
one of the alphabeticals.
Which of the following can be reliably concluded on the basis of the
Statements given?
A. Only Euripides’ best-known works are accompanied by ancient
commentaries in extant medieval manuscripts.
B. The select plays are accompanied by ancient commentaries
because they were the best known of Euripides’ works.
C. No commentaries were written about Euripides’ Electra in
ancient times.
D. Euripides’ Medea never appears in medieval manuscripts
unaccompanied by ancient commentary.
E. Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a com-
mentary in any extant medieval manuscript.
答案是E,但我觉得选D,请NN指教!谢谢
真气人,被ETS玩得天旋地转, 干脆翻译成中文后再看:
Q18. 中世纪手稿L包含了 希腊剧作家E写的、所有现存的18个悲剧. 其中,10个"精选剧本"在手稿L中有古人的评注, 并且它们(指这10个剧本,是否包括评注不知道,因为该句主语是ten)也出现在其他中世纪手稿中;"精选剧本"里包含了E的一些最著名作品,如Medea. 其余8个按字母顺序排列,且没有评注.Electra是这8个其中之一.
问可以推出什么可靠的结论?
A. 在所有现存的手稿中,只有E的最著名作品才有古人的评注.------------错,题目只说了手稿L的情况,其他手稿什么情况并不知道.
B. 这10个精选剧本被古人评注 那是因为它们(指这10个剧本)是E写的最著名的作品.------------错, 精选的不一定全是最著名的,题目只说Medea最著名,而"精选剧本"中的剩余9个是否著名不知道. 可能就有那么一个是不著名的,且它被评注是因为政治因素.
C. 古时候,从来没人写过Electra的评注.------------错, 有人写了并且遗失了不行啊? 况且题目只说手稿L中Electra没有评注,可能在其他手稿中就有评注.
D. 任何中世纪手稿中,只要出现Medea,就必同时出现它的古人评注.------------错,简直扯蛋, 题目没说其他手稿一定包含Medea的古人评注.
E. 在任何现存的中世纪手稿中,Electra和它的评注(注意没有限定古人评注,而其他选项都限定了"古人评注")不会同时出现.------------错, 可能有个现存的中世纪手稿N中就有Electra和它的评注, 或者某某剧作家现在就写一篇.
无语............没一个结论可靠!@#$%^&*
要我看如果问"最可能的结论",那么就只能是B了, 只要默认"assumption:精选的全是著名的"就行.
手稿啊,应该是最原始的,评注是直接添加在手稿里的
现在就写的就和原来的那篇不一样了,即使一样,也不叫手稿,叫抄本
手稿啊,应该是最原始的,评注是直接添加在手稿里的
现在就写的就和原来的那篇不一样了,即使一样,也不叫手稿,叫抄本
好像不是这样噢! 评注不是只有作者自己能写的,同一个剧本,可以有不同的评注.
are accompanied in L by ancient commentaries
就跟我们做笔记一样,就是写在课本旁边的嘛
Euripides lived in 480BC and medieval is from 8AD to 14AD, so medieval manuscript is not original by Euripides anyway ...
i think it's E
pay attention to L cintains "all eightteen extant" tragedies.
能否这么理解
manuscript 除了手稿/原稿的意思,在词典的解释里还有"手抄文件或书籍"的意思,在这段文中取的是第二种意思 既后人的手抄本.
C因为 No commentry ....in ancient time? 因为没有保留到现在并不代表以前没有过.而且Commentry未必包括在L中
D 原文中的意思"Selected play"有Commentry在L中,并且也出"Select play"出现在其他古代文献中,而并不是指"带有Commentry的Select play出现在古代文献中",从这里可以推出有可能没有带"Commentry"的"Select play"出现在其他古代文献里
所以D错
Of these, ten called the “select
plays,” are accompanied in L by ancient commentaries and also appear in other medieval manuscripts;
are 和appear并列,主语都是ten,这十个戏剧在其他的中世纪手稿也有发现,下面的the other
的八个作为对比,并未在除L之外的中世纪手稿发现.
自然,L上无评论,就不可能有带有评论的那八个戏剧出现在L以外了.
所以E对.
这样理解我觉得比较符合出题意图.
首先extant是“现存的”的意思
其次,可以用数学集合的概念解决。
medea属于——〉“select plays,” accompanied in L by ancient commentaries 属于——〉L&OTHER;
Electr属于———〉L之外的集合。
再由“ L contains all eighteen extant tragedies by the Greek playwright Euripides.”得ancient commentaries 和Electr没有交集,所以不可能同时出现。
by the Greek playwright Euripides.”得ancient commentaries 和Electr没有交集,所以不可能同时出现。
Nmm,呵呵,实际就是否定修饰的问题,does not 这里是修饰appear,对appear的否定,也就是对appear (accompanied by a comentary) in any 的否定,说到底是对修饰apear 的作状语的介词短语in any否定,也可写作appear( ) not in any,意为“并不出现在任何手稿里”或“并不在任何手稿里出现"
如果要照大部分人错误理解在任何manuscript 里都不伴随评论出现,应对accompanied by 否定,即appear not accompanied by a commentary in any
xiaxiagmat,thank you 懂了
我觉得not any是全部否定,并不时部分否定,所以不同意以上的分析。
这道题有定论了吗?
同意39和43楼的解释.
我是这样理解的,各位NN给看看呀~~~
题目信息:
L包括所有的现存的18部the Greek playwright Euripides的悲剧
10部有古人评注,在其他书中出现过——〉剩下8部未出现在其他书中
8部
字母顺序,无评注
c. No commentaries were written about Euripides’ Electra in ancient times.
在古代E就没被评论,ancient times太泛泛了
d. Euripides’ Medea never appears in medieval manuscripts unaccompanied by ancient commentary. M在没有古人评论的书中没出现过,原文说出现在其他书中,但未提是否其他书也有评论
e. Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary in any extant medieval manuscript.
在任何尚存的书中未出现评论 原文可推出
The situation can be split into the following three
points:
1. The tragedies were written in the ancient time by Euripides.
And the manuscript collection L, which was edited in Medieval times, just
included these tragedies.
2. When the tragedies were
published at the ancient times, the 10 “select plays”, which contain some of
Euripides’ best-known works, were added commentaries. The same 10 plays were
also included in other Medieval manuscript collections.
3. The other eight plays were
not added commentaries.
So it means that when the
other 8 plays were written in the ancient time, nobody added commentaries. So
they do not contain any ancient commentaries. Therefore, even they were later
included in some Medieval collections of manuscripts, they still don’t have any
ancient commentaries. So E is correct.
L收录了所有现存的18个希腊悲剧,10个有注释,而且这10个也被其他手稿收录,这里边儿有一些E的最出名的著作,包括MEDEA。
剩下内8个,按字母顺序排列,没有注释。其中有一篇是ELECTRA。
A.原文没有直接的证据说明只有E这个人的最好的作品才有古人的注释。排除。
B.
这个因果关系没依据,原文不能直接推出有人写注释是因为它们是E的最出名的小说。排除。
C.
L里面没收录不能推出没人写过。排除
D.
人家说了M是有注释的,肯定错误。
E.
ELECTRA并不是在任何一部中世纪的手稿中都有注释,显然L就没有,所以E很正确~
确定肯定以及一定选 E
如果"
Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary in any extant medieval manuscript."翻译成E''E 并不是在任何中世纪的手稿里都伴随着评论出现"
那"E'E在任何中世纪的手稿中都不伴随着手稿出现"应该怎么翻译呢? 难道所有这种not..any的句型都要像E中选项那样理解? 比如I don't cry in any situation,意思就是"我并不是在任何情形下就哭"? 其实觉得在这道题里把not..in any翻译成不是在任何..都..来解释E是合理的,但是以后遇到这种情况该如何理解呢?比如"I don't cry in any situation"我就一直理解为"在任何情形下我都不会哭"
难道所有这种not..any的句型都要像E中选项那样理解? 比如I don't cry in any situation,意思就是"我并不是在任何情形下就哭"?
其实觉得在这道题里把not..in any翻译成不是在任何..都..来解释E是合理的,但是以后遇到这种情况该如何理解呢?比如"I don't cry in any situation"我就一直理解为"在任何情形下我都不会哭"
[啊 忍不住上来说一嘴, 哪个 NOT IN ANY 是全部否定, 但是全部否定的话E仍然对, 为什么呢?
第一句话说 一本书有这么十八部作品 。 这是十八部作品。。。。怎样怎样,
注意,这样是非限定性的, 谁说作者要表达在L中没伴随COMMENT了, 作者就是要说全部的作品中Elactora没有COMMENT ! 第一句话就是一个引子而已。
还是不太懂...jbyupei GG 可不可以忍不住说两句啊?
什么是非限定性的? 为什么是非限定性的,E就对了呢?
不理解啊!不理解!!
谁再给我解释解释啊。。。
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |